From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Moore To: Waiman Long , Eric Paris Cc: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, sds@tycho.nsa.gov Subject: Re: Follow-up on the lblnet-next tree Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:14:46 -0400 Message-ID: <3166714.Qb6aJAv2jX@sifl> In-Reply-To: <522E5B41.9090003@hp.com> References: <3261672.EsmV8HmHXd@sifl> <522E5B41.9090003@hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Monday, September 09, 2013 07:35:29 PM Waiman Long wrote: > On 07/23/2013 06:05 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > > Just a quick follow-up to let you know that I've rebased the lblnet-next > > tree to Linus' post -rc2 tree from earlier today. I did a quick > > build/boot/test cycle and everything looked sane to me, but additional > > testing is always welcome. > > > > * git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/lblnet-2.6_next > > * http://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/lblnet-2.6_next > > Just want to know if you are planning to push those patches into v3.12. You and me both. Your patches, as well as a number of others, should go in via Eric's SELinux tree, not my labeled networking tree; I was simply hosting the patches to get them some exposure in linux-next. A few weeks back Eric merged the patches into his SELinux tree so I dropped them from lblnet-next to prevent conflicts. Eric, push them patches up to James already. It is absolutely ridiculous that we've got bug fixes that have missed *several* kernel releases because you aren't pushing fixes upstream. This is *extremely* frustrating. -- paul moore security and virtualization @ redhat -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.