All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, netfs@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] cachefiles: Use lookup_one() rather than lookup_one_len()
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 13:49:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3170280.1742478565@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250320-goldbarren-brauhaus-6d6ff0a7be72@brauner>

Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> wrote:

> > > It also uses the lookup_one_len() family of functions which implicitly
> > > use &nop_mnt_idmap.  This mixture of implicit and explicit could be
> > > confusing.  When we eventually update cachefiles to support idmap mounts
> > > it
> > 
> > Is that something we ever plan to do?
> 
> It should be pretty easy to do. I just didn't see a reason to do it yet.
> 
> Fwiw, the cache paths that cachefiles uses aren't private mounts like
> overlayfs does it, i.e., cachefiles doesn't do clone_private_mount() before
> stashing cache->mnt. ...

This is probably something cachefilesd needs to do in userspace before telling
the kernel through /dev/cachefiles where to find the cache.

David


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-20 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-19  3:01 [PATCH 0/6 RFC v2] tidy up various VFS lookup functions NeilBrown
2025-03-19  3:01 ` [PATCH 1/6] VFS: improve interface for lookup_one functions NeilBrown
2025-03-19  8:40   ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-20 10:17   ` Jeff Layton
2025-03-20 14:04   ` David Howells
2025-03-22  0:29     ` Al Viro
2025-03-28  1:18     ` NeilBrown
2025-04-04 13:41       ` Christian Brauner
2025-04-04 13:46         ` Christian Brauner
2025-04-04 23:00           ` NeilBrown
2025-03-22  0:27   ` Al Viro
2025-03-28  1:14     ` NeilBrown
2025-03-19  3:01 ` [PATCH 2/6] nfsd: Use lookup_one() rather than lookup_one_len() NeilBrown
2025-03-19 13:04   ` Chuck Lever
2025-03-20 10:19   ` Jeff Layton
2025-03-19  3:01 ` [PATCH 3/6] cachefiles: " NeilBrown
2025-03-20 10:22   ` Jeff Layton
2025-03-20 12:05     ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-20 13:49       ` David Howells [this message]
2025-03-20 14:04         ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-19  3:01 ` [PATCH 4/6] VFS: rename lookup_one_len family to lookup_noperm and remove permission check NeilBrown
2025-03-20 10:29   ` Jeff Layton
2025-03-22  0:34   ` Al Viro
2025-03-28  1:31     ` NeilBrown
2025-03-19  3:01 ` [PATCH 5/6] Use try_lookup_noperm() instead of d_hash_and_lookup() outside of VFS NeilBrown
2025-03-20 10:45   ` Jeff Layton
2025-03-22  0:39   ` Al Viro
2025-03-19  3:01 ` [PATCH 6/6] VFS: change lookup_one_common and lookup_noperm_common to take a qstr NeilBrown
2025-03-20 10:46   ` Jeff Layton
2025-03-19  8:42 ` [PATCH 0/6 RFC v2] tidy up various VFS lookup functions Christian Brauner
2025-03-19  9:23   ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3170280.1742478565@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.