From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Ye, MingjinX" <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
"Zhou, YidingX" <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>,
"Yang, Qiming" <qiming.yang@intel.com>,
"Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
"ferruh.yigit@amd.com" <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ice: fix get link status timeout
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2023 10:15:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3175550.aV6nBDHxoP@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN7PR11MB713929848E6477FDFFD44DB6E5DA9@SN7PR11MB7139.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
06/02/2023 09:14, Ye, MingjinX:
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> > 06/02/2023 07:22, Mingjin Ye:
> > > When hw is just started, it will immediately obtain the link status,
> > > and the longest attempt is 1 second. Some NICs are slow to initialize,
> > > which make it fails to obtain the link status.
> > >
> > > The patch fixes this issue by modifying the longest attempt to 5 seconds.
> >
> > What is the consequence?
>
> DPDK could not get link status. At this point, the link status obtained through
> the pmd API is wrong.
>
> > In which case, DPDK application would be blocked during 5 seconds?
>
> When the dpdk application startup port is used, it will be blocked for up
> to 5 seconds to ensure that the connection status can be obtained.
I mean what is the consequence of the increase?
For example, if the port is not connected (no wire),
are we going to wait 5 seconds?
I guess it's OK because it won't wait at all if using rte_eth_link_get_nowait.
It may be interesting to note in the commit message.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-06 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-06 6:22 [PATCH] net/ice: fix get link status timeout Mingjin Ye
2023-02-06 7:23 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-02-06 8:14 ` Ye, MingjinX
2023-02-06 9:15 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2023-02-06 10:06 ` Ye, MingjinX
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-02-06 7:56 韩爽
2023-02-06 10:51 ` Ye, MingjinX
2023-02-07 6:48 ` Yang, Qiming
2023-02-06 8:35 Shuang Han
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3175550.aV6nBDHxoP@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=mingjinx.ye@intel.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=yidingx.zhou@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.