Re: [PATCH v11 2/3] sched: Move task_mm_cid_work to mm work_struct

[Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>]

On 2025-03-10 10:46, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-02-27 at 16:33 +0100, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
>> Currently, the task_mm_cid_work function is called in a task work
>> triggered by a scheduler tick to frequently compact the mm_cids of
>> each
>> process. This can delay the execution of the corresponding thread for
>> the entire duration of the function, negatively affecting the
>> response
>> in case of real time tasks. In practice, we observe task_mm_cid_work
>> increasing the latency of 30-35us on a 128 cores system, this order
>> of
>> magnitude is meaningful under PREEMPT_RT.
>>
>> Run the task_mm_cid_work in a new work_struct connected to the
>> mm_struct rather than in the task context before returning to
>> userspace.
>>
>> This work_struct is initialised with the mm and disabled before
>> freeing
>> it. The queuing of the work happens while returning to userspace in
>> __rseq_handle_notify_resume, maintaining the checks to avoid running
>> more frequently than MM_CID_SCAN_DELAY.
>> To make sure this happens predictably also on long running tasks, we
>> trigger a call to __rseq_handle_notify_resume also from the scheduler
>> tick if the runtime exceeded a 100ms threshold.
>> [...]
>>
>> Fixes: 223baf9d17f2 ("sched: Fix performance regression introduced by
>> mm_cid")
>> Signed-off-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
> 
> Is this patch missing anything?
> 
> I refactored a bit to have it build in configurations without RSEQ
> and/or MM_CID (which was failing v10)

Found a small nit. Please fix and resend with my reviewed-by, and
that version will be ready for inclusion.

Thanks!

Mathieu


> 
> Thanks,
> Gabriele
> 


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com