From: "Svetoslav Slavtchev" <svetljo@gmx.de>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: drop symbolink link to kernel headers
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 17:24:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32043.1074792242@www1.gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5701.1074622084@www46.gmx.net>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 07:08:04PM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> > Hi,
> > the attached patch removes the need from a symbolik link to kernel
> headers
> > when compiling against klibc.
> > if KERNEL_DIR is not specified it looks for kernel headers
> > in /usr/src/linux( of course you could change it to /lib/modules/`uname
> > -r`/build )
>
> It's a nice idea, but is it really needed?
well, i could always patch it :-)
and may be other packagers too,
but i think it's a good idea
> No one should be putting their kernel code in /usr/src/linux, so that's
> just a bad thing to start with. /usr/src/linux points to the version of
> linux that your glibc was built against, that is all.
every distribution( at least the major ones) do have a package kernel source
which does install in /usr/src/linux-[version] and put's a symlink
/usr/src/linux
( and /lib/modules/`uname -r`) to it
from my experiance i can say this is true for Mandrake, RedHat, SuSE
and i think Debian too
and most if not all external modules do check for kernel headers
in the above locations( and not only modules, but also programs
e.g. iptables, dvb apps.)
> > the main idea is to build packages a bit easier/ pretier
> > instead of creating a symbolik link, one can specify
> > make KERNEL_DIR=[path to kernel] or omit it in case
> > kernel sources are available in /usr/src/linux
>
> Does the current situation really cause that much of a problem in
> building packages?
>
it's not a trouble, but IMHO it's a bit ugly to create symlink to kernel
source
in the package build
best,
svetljo
--
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
Bis 31.1.: TopMail + Digicam für nur 29 EUR http://www.gmx.net/topmail
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-22 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-20 18:08 PATCH: drop symbolink link to kernel headers Svetoslav Slavtchev
2004-01-21 23:53 ` Greg KH
2004-01-22 0:40 `
2004-01-22 1:51 `
2004-01-22 3:42 ` Dave Dodge
2004-01-22 17:06 ` linas
2004-01-22 17:24 ` Svetoslav Slavtchev [this message]
2004-01-22 17:28 ` Greg KH
2004-01-22 17:31 ` Greg KH
2004-02-03 0:52 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=32043.1074792242@www1.gmx.net \
--to=svetljo@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.