From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEEB9C4363A for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 14:46:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A1BB20732 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 14:46:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=crudebyte.com header.i=@crudebyte.com header.b="Ea5VWwnV" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0A1BB20732 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=crudebyte.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:51910 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kY9Bu-0002AZ-V6 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:46:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53294) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kY8xj-0001KX-Vp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:31:36 -0400 Received: from lizzy.crudebyte.com ([91.194.90.13]:40041) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kY8xg-0006lb-2r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:31:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=crudebyte.com; s=lizzy; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From: Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=t0HrzI832l4JbOJJSgR5g51dru18OKqRUzK2xU6t0FA=; b=Ea5VWwnVS4MbshwI575G/0fWox a7hcp0MGmV9jTjmcY/GijsRCSN1m268z+6zRBaoIMi73pmyL+rBGvb1Ij0sQlQxvZwN55MeprSfG9 WDF9VAqJFNeFAjnTmLYMPH8Wz6zzk3RcxJGosqzBP7RrpmiQN3nw6tnlZwtK+dUbHQTkb33qK20gJ GppAoT2fgbszjRUCK66CC9yQGHwGBph3RBR5rjZBjkKIrERxM9CsUzIAI+nJcC5ZwrlaH/QlLPHuz Y0rwU75GkQH/O5iMwGCnuIlQ4zxWAbvE37nMe7EOntt/mrK7q9s5Q+UuGDwmlXdxi0scqDhyWTHEF LWN5o98w==; From: Christian Schoenebeck To: Peter Maydell Cc: QEMU Developers , Greg Kurz Subject: Re: [PULL 00/13] 9p queue 2020-10-23 Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:31:27 +0100 Message-ID: <3209306.Oi7kq7t7ax@silver> In-Reply-To: References: <5649161.sut93UlCx4@silver> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=91.194.90.13; envelope-from=qemu_oss@crudebyte.com; helo=lizzy.crudebyte.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/29 08:52:23 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Donnerstag, 29. Oktober 2020 15:15:19 CET Peter Maydell wrote: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 at 14:06, Christian Schoenebeck > > wrote: > > Ok, I'll use mkdtemp() instead, that avoids other potential parallel > > config > > colissions that I may not have considered yet. > > > > The original motivation against mkdtemp() was that /tmp is isually a > > ramfs, > > hence very limited regarding large file tests. But that's not an issue > > right now. > > How large is "large" here ? > > thanks > -- PMM E.g. ~10 GiB which might be a problem for cloud based CI platforms. But again, we don't have any 9p test doing that yet. So mkdtemp() is just fine for now. Best regards, Christian Schoenebeck