From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yuri Weinstein Subject: Re: hammer branch for v0.94.2 ready for QE Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 18:52:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <322852770.9958799.1433026361754.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> References: <5559DE24.4010601@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mx3-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.24]:56481 "EHLO mx3-phx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751192AbbE3Wxs convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 May 2015 18:53:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5559DE24.4010601@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Loic Dachary Cc: Ceph Development , Abhishek L , Alfredo Deza , Loic Dachary , Gregory Farnum , Sage Weil , Ian Colle QE validation is complete and this release is ready for publishing. (Greg, I assumed that you approved this release with failures in knfs s= uite re: unresolved #11789, marked for v0.94.3 backport) Summary of all tests performed for this releases and notes can be found= in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11492 . Thx YuriW ----- Original Message ----- =46rom: "Loic Dachary" To: "Yuri Weinstein" Cc: "Ceph Development" , "Abhishek L" Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 5:42:12 AM Subject: hammer branch for v0.94.2 ready for QE Hi Yuri, The hammer branch for v0.94.2 as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/= commits/hammer has been approved by Greg, Yehuda, Josh and Sam and is r= eady for QE. For the record, the head is https://github.com/ceph/ceph/c= ommit/63832d4039889b6b704b88b86eaba4aadcfceb2e and the details of the t= ests run are at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11492 Note that it has two more commits compared to what you tested before: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/293affe992118ed6e04f685030b2d83a794= ca624 fixing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11622 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/a43d24861089a02f3b42061e482e05016a0= 021f6 fixing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11604 which address two blockers that you listed at http://tracker.ceph.com/i= ssues/11492#QE-Validation These two new commits only have influence, directly or indirectly, on r= gw. They do not require or deserve a new run of the rados, fs or rbd su= ite because none of them depend on rgw, directly or indirectly. The other two issues listed as blockers are http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11613#note-4 do not need a backport to h= ammer http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11591 is a teuthology related issue that= can be worked around and does not need to be a blocker for hammer Cheers --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html