From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sandeep Tyagi <sandeepktyagi@gmail.com>
Subject: fsync performance of reiser 4
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 17:31:15 +0530
Message-ID: <3257ddd0050825050117ead2ba@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_541_1803594.1124971275817"
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-25642-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

------=_Part_541_1803594.1124971275817
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi -
Does anybody any idea whether reiserfs people are working on improvement of=
=20
fsync performance of Reiser 4.
We have an application in which we use lot of fsyncs so we are planning to=
=20
Reiser 4 if it gives good performance with fsync.
Thanks=20

--=20
-----------
S K T
-----------

------=_Part_541_1803594.1124971275817
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

<div>Hi -</div>
<div>Does anybody any idea whether reiserfs people are working on improveme=
nt of fsync performance of Reiser 4.</div>
<div>We have an application in which we use lot of fsyncs so we are plannin=
g to Reiser 4 if it gives good performance with fsync.<br clear=3D"all"></d=
iv>
<div>Thanks </div>
<div><br>-- <br>-----------<br>S K T<br>----------- </div>

------=_Part_541_1803594.1124971275817--