From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guido Winkelmann Subject: Re: Unmountable btrfs filesystems Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:47:44 +0200 Message-ID: <32695314.Vnmc9MkfxK@pc10> References: <4FDCD484.50706@widodh.nl> <4FDCDA83.7070708@inktank.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from unknownsite.de ([62.48.69.106]:42203 "EHLO hartes-hannover.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757428Ab2FVOrr (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:47:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4FDCDA83.7070708@inktank.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mark Nelson Cc: ceph-devel Am Samstag, 16. Juni 2012, 14:12:03 schrieb Mark Nelson: > btrfsck might tell you what's wrong. Sounds like there is a > btrfs-restore command in the dangerdonteveruse branch you could try. > Beyond that, I guess it just really comes down to tradeoffs. I've had similar problems in the recent past. Turns out Ceph makes heavy use of btrfs snapshots when running on btrfs, and btrfs-restore will not restore those, so it cannot be used to restore a broken osd. Guido