From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44A36093A; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:17:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Dec 2017 05:17:47 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,426,1508828400"; d="scan'208";a="17287488" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.161]) ([10.237.68.161]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Dec 2017 05:17:45 -0800 To: Derek Straka References: <1512414044-1012-1-git-send-email-mark.asselstine@windriver.com> <711527ad-77fa-947f-2186-1d7835e1783e@linux.intel.com> <20171218210256.GQ27580@vctlabs.com> <2bc1c40c-3f63-7311-b8a3-81bd05ea474f@linux.intel.com> From: Alexander Kanavin Message-ID: <32cbea3c-5275-cd8e-e7ef-7654e1e94bfa@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 15:12:13 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: Mark Asselstine , openembeded-devel , openembedded-core Subject: Re: splitting python's standard library X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:17:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 12/19/2017 02:31 PM, Derek Straka wrote: > Well, I've been able to do it just fine for the majority of packages in > meta-python by myself.  Since I contribute the majority of the patches > and maintain the layer, I want this capability maintained in > meta-python.  If you plan on removing that functionality in oe-core, I'd > like to have the opportunity to maintain the python recipes there as > well rather than have a feature unilaterally removed.  I don't consider > it a burden and my customers find it valuable to split things out. If you're able to take over the maintenance of oe-core's python packages, then that's great and much appreciated! I'll send a patch that assigns them to you in a moment. Alex From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44A36093A; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:17:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Dec 2017 05:17:47 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,426,1508828400"; d="scan'208";a="17287488" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.161]) ([10.237.68.161]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Dec 2017 05:17:45 -0800 To: Derek Straka References: <1512414044-1012-1-git-send-email-mark.asselstine@windriver.com> <711527ad-77fa-947f-2186-1d7835e1783e@linux.intel.com> <20171218210256.GQ27580@vctlabs.com> <2bc1c40c-3f63-7311-b8a3-81bd05ea474f@linux.intel.com> From: Alexander Kanavin Message-ID: <32cbea3c-5275-cd8e-e7ef-7654e1e94bfa@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 15:12:13 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: "S. Lockwood-Childs" , openembeded-devel , openembedded-core Subject: Re: splitting python's standard library X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:17:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 12/19/2017 02:31 PM, Derek Straka wrote: > Well, I've been able to do it just fine for the majority of packages in > meta-python by myself.  Since I contribute the majority of the patches > and maintain the layer, I want this capability maintained in > meta-python.  If you plan on removing that functionality in oe-core, I'd > like to have the opportunity to maintain the python recipes there as > well rather than have a feature unilaterally removed.  I don't consider > it a burden and my customers find it valuable to split things out. If you're able to take over the maintenance of oe-core's python packages, then that's great and much appreciated! I'll send a patch that assigns them to you in a moment. Alex