From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-oa1-f50.google.com (mail-oa1-f50.google.com [209.85.160.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7B431DFE7 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 07:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="g/4EIAZ8" Received: by mail-oa1-f50.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-2044ecf7035so138028fac.0 for ; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 23:15:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1704352549; x=1704957349; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=X2SmQScyvIuLdY3E1hFWKaRhiC86WTLlAjqHutwpfeQ=; b=g/4EIAZ8aG3N5qr1Zy2dwkI6wr+LlW4WOuySrrO8b/ZkfDWRIXti5QEvKj5gtwHEwR X/y0IBSspYxrdEwLDjgbi3+RyAJHaqDZvmZsw3dXHY405GVrLsLiiNYcl321uZel+Eo4 G0U+8rBAUUpaAglxC+eQD9rC4vbpP0fBhNaaAd6nvr8qCsyhMlqgPotG3M0gzhDX4xxC G9lKiF3Glac/OIlvk3PZr6uyS6MkesU+7EZxvp25J0AvvIK7jdP+uShMPlnrtbHR3TEP b6Bpdrvcybs1CsTIt+LjiSVDTe3m/OAuwbYYRsMc289m2JC73PQILa80V28Zh6C0mvBt 8auA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704352549; x=1704957349; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=X2SmQScyvIuLdY3E1hFWKaRhiC86WTLlAjqHutwpfeQ=; b=AkJBtiaunXE6cVarOB/VDt/ORp9NuiriQyj7zYw6wvQr7Wyy8+yh5f6QkUgcOqzRN0 5uXIq5Is0WLdN5YWGTahaGCrLHjixZ2whwqgAR/0R6ts1A3bRDIpAEeeagS0EekgWJYi XHFqfaQb25pHSuF12gISst2h1dLoAf+AV+j1Mq/yWgd7pByobC7QAppJqyAECIJ0+J94 BEB5vOcP7d6ZppEZ4rx9CxY6JvsXbFWdsd7BeYGnhni8bOSc6c9J9M93buCsN855G/+U XvCCS8dbudp9T452ZWsH4HR9pY+Vh+oyVgOI/10L91zNq09n+/jMtur3rOJ0mmOnwXn9 dZyg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxCRJfsxXePZUe9pLxsFRnO0s0pyEuZs4PyqLuOMM1iJlnWLiWs GHKl1hN6d9ugnzvp9pkf108kSIzzco8k5w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFDtkmc/5Itm2/vrFUrhCZarPV/ONCswJm00ZQe5veImd2aILrozVH3VBmTM9uNWBifaFHrHA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6871:e410:b0:203:ef6e:2319 with SMTP id py16-20020a056871e41000b00203ef6e2319mr251670oac.10.1704352548337; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 23:15:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.17.16] ([138.84.62.99]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u11-20020a9d4d8b000000b006d9fb0458cdsm4542214otk.39.2024.01.03.23.15.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Jan 2024 23:15:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <32ebe3f1-49b7-4ad3-9ea5-ed2adbbd78da@linaro.org> Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 01:15:45 -0600 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6 00/49] 6.6.10-rc1 review Content-Language: en-US From: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_D=C3=ADaz?= To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, allen.lkml@gmail.com, leo@leolam.fr, johannes.berg@intel.com References: <20240103164834.970234661@linuxfoundation.org> <99fe3993-51b5-4284-8a22-869764f393d8@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <99fe3993-51b5-4284-8a22-869764f393d8@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello! On 03/01/24 10:10 p. m., Daniel Díaz wrote: > Hello! > > On 03/01/24 10:55 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.6.10 release. >> There are 49 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >> let me know. >> >> Responses should be made by Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:47:49 +0000. >> Anything received after that time might be too late. >> >> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>     https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.6.10-rc1.gz >> or in the git tree and branch at: >>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.6.y >> and the diffstat can be found below. >> >> thanks, >> >> greg k-h > > We're seeing a build regression with x86/GCC-8 and allmodconfig: > > -----8<----- >   In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/string.h:294, >                    from /builds/linux/include/linux/bitmap.h:11, >                    from /builds/linux/include/linux/cpumask.h:12, >                    from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:17, >                    from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h:62, >                    from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:19, >                    from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:5, >                    from /builds/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:53, >                    from /builds/linux/include/linux/thread_info.h:60, >                    from /builds/linux/include/linux/uio.h:9, >                    from /builds/linux/include/linux/socket.h:8, >                    from /builds/linux/include/uapi/linux/if.h:25, >                    from /builds/linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c:11: >   In function 'nl80211_set_cqm_rssi.isra.44', >       inlined from 'nl80211_set_cqm' at /builds/linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c:13000:10: >   /builds/linux/include/linux/fortify-string.h:57:29: error: '__builtin_memcpy' pointer overflow between offset 36 and size [-1, 9223372036854775807] [-Werror=array-bounds] >    #define __underlying_memcpy __builtin_memcpy >                                ^ >   /builds/linux/include/linux/fortify-string.h:648:2: note: in expansion of macro '__underlying_memcpy' >     __underlying_##op(p, q, __fortify_size);   \ >     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ >   /builds/linux/include/linux/fortify-string.h:693:26: note: in expansion of macro '__fortify_memcpy_chk' >    #define memcpy(p, q, s)  __fortify_memcpy_chk(p, q, s,   \ >                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >   /builds/linux/net/wireless/nl80211.c:12939:3: note: in expansion of macro 'memcpy' >      memcpy(cqm_config->rssi_thresholds, thresholds, >      ^~~~~~ >   cc1: all warnings being treated as errors >   make[5]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:243: net/wireless/nl80211.o] Error 1 > ----->8----- > > This is currently being bisected, so there is more to follow. Bisection pointed to: commit 92045aab1bd9bfd73d816e907ea07739c4550b41 Author: Johannes Berg Date: Sat Dec 16 05:47:15 2023 +0000 wifi: cfg80211: fix CQM for non-range use commit 7e7efdda6adb385fbdfd6f819d76bc68c923c394 upstream. Reverting that was not possible, so I reverted 47f3694a4259 first ("wifi: nl80211: fix deadlock in nl80211_set_cqm_rssi (6.6.x)"), but that was not enough. After reverting both 47f3694a4259 and 92045aab1bd9, the build passed again. Reproducer: tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch x86_64 --toolchain gcc-8 --kconfig allmodconfig Greetings! Daniel Díaz daniel.diaz@linaro.org