From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] Introducing SPDX License Identifiers Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 19:32:20 +0100 Message-ID: <3307824.7b7B2xNfMZ@xps> References: <1513600744-13749-1-git-send-email-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> <1513678481-30653-1-git-send-email-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stephen@networkplumber.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com To: Hemant Agrawal Return-path: Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9247D30 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 19:32:41 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1513678481-30653-1-git-send-email-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 19/12/2017 11:14, Hemant Agrawal: > The DPDK uses the Open Source BSD-3-Clause license for the core libraries > and drivers. The kernel components are naturally GPLv2 licensed. > > Many of the files in the DPDK source code contain the full text of the > applicable license. For example, most of the BSD-3-Clause files contain a > full copy of the BSD-3-Clause license text. > > Including big blocks of License headers in all files blows up the source > code with mostly redundant information. An additional problem is that even > the same licenses are referred to by a number of slightly varying text > blocks (full, abbreviated, different indentation, line wrapping and/or > white space, with obsolete address information, ...) which makes validation > and automatic processing a nightmare. > > To make this easier, DPDK uses of a single line reference to > Unique License Identifiers in source files as defined by the Linux > Foundation's SPDX project https://spdk.org. > > Adding license information in this fashion, rather than adding full license > text, can be more efficient for developers; decreases errors; and improves > automated detection of licenses. The current set of valid, predefined SPDX > identifiers is set forth on the SPDX License List at > https://spdx.org/licenses/. > > For example, to label a file as subject to the BSD-3-Clause license, > the following text would be used as the top line of the file. > > SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause > > Note: Any new file contributions in DPDK shall adhere to the above scheme. > It is also recommended to replace or at least amend the existing license > text in the code with SPDX-License-Identifiers. > > Any exception to DPDK IP policies shall be approved by DPDK tech board and > DPDK Governing Board. Steps for any exception approval: > 1. Mention the appropriate license identifier form SPDX. If the license is > not listed in SPDX Licenses. It is the submitters responsibiliity to get > it first listed. > 2. Get the required approval from the DPDK Technical Board. Technical board > may advise the author to check alternate means first. If no other > alternatives are found and the merit of the contributions are important > for DPDK's mission, it may decide on such exception with two-thirds vote > of the members. > 3. Technical board then approach Governing board for such limited approval > for the given contribution only. > > Any approvals shall be documented in "licenses/exceptions.txt" with record > dates. > > Note: From the legal point of view, this patch is supposed to be only a > change to the textual representation of the license information, but in no > way any change to the actual license terms. With this patch applied, all > files will still be licensed under the same terms they were before. > > Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal > Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon Applied, thanks