From: MikeJeezy <forums@mgaccess.net>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Optimal XFS formatting options?
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:27:23 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33145068.post@talk.nabble.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F12006F.8080805@hardwarefreak.com>
>So let's assume your vendor does the smart thing and allows you
>flexibility in specifying per drive strip size. Assume for example the
>stripe unit (strip, chunk) of the array is 64KB, there are 10 stripe
>spindles (12-2=10), and the local device name of the LUN is /dev/sdb.
>To create an aligned XFS filesystem on this you would use something like:
>$ mkfs.xfs -d su=64k sw=10 /dev/sdb
Great explanations! (some of it I am still trying to understand :-) In this
case on my HP P2000 G3, I do have a 64k chunk size so I will do:
$ mkfs.xfs -d su=64k,sw=10 /dev/sdd
Question: Does the above command assume I do not already have a partition
created? I was
http://www.fhgfs.com/wiki/wikka.php?wakka=PartitionAlignment reading here
that the easiest way to acheive partition alignment is to create the file
system directly on the storage device without any paritions - such as $
mkfs.xfs /dev/sdd (and your example above also hints at this)
When I created my current partiton, I used the following commands:
$ parted -a optimal /dev/sdd
$ mklabel gpt
$ mkpart primary 0 -0
$ q
I would like to align the partiton as well, but I am not sure how to acheive
this using parted. This will be the only partition on the LUN, so not sure
if I even need to create one (although I do like to stay consistent with my
other volumes).
When printing the partition info with parted I see:
# (parted) p
Model: HP P2000 G3 iSCSI (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdd: 4900GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: gpt
Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
1 1049kB 4900GB 4900GB xfs primary
but from reading, I suspect the Sector size should be more like:
(logical/physical): 512B/65536B. Any thoughts on partition alignment or
other thoughts in general? Thank you.
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Optimal-XFS-formatting-options--tp33140169p33145068.html
Sent from the Xfs - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-07 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-14 17:44 Optimal XFS formatting options? MikeJeezy
2012-01-14 22:23 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-01-16 0:27 ` MikeJeezy [this message]
2012-01-16 4:56 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-01-16 23:11 ` Dave Chinner
2012-01-17 3:31 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-01-17 9:19 ` Michael Monnerie
2012-01-17 11:17 ` Emmanuel Florac
2012-01-17 11:34 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-01-20 15:52 ` Michael Monnerie
2012-01-20 22:44 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-01-24 10:31 ` Michael Monnerie
2012-01-15 1:14 ` Peter Grandi
2012-01-20 9:03 ` Linda Walsh
2012-01-20 12:06 ` Peter Grandi
2012-01-20 15:55 ` Michael Monnerie
2012-01-23 4:21 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=33145068.post@talk.nabble.com \
--to=forums@mgaccess.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.