From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta@linux.dev>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf, x86: Fix per-CPU address resolution into an extended register
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 13:44:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3338fd93155ac14b3b824ce232ae7be288072608.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814203248.3714536-2-vineet.gupta@linux.dev>
On Fri, 2026-08-14 at 13:32 -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> The destination of the per-CPU address MOV is encoded in ModRM.reg,
> which is extended by REX.R, but the REX prefix is built with
> add_1mod(), which sets REX.B. REX.B extends ModRM.rm and SIB.base, and
> this instruction addresses memory as disp32 with no base, so the bit
> has no effect at all and the high register bit is simply lost.
>
> Every is_ereg() destination therefore resolves to the wrong register,
> picking whichever one shares the low three bits:
>
> R5 -> RAX R7 -> RBP R8 -> RSI R9 -> RDI
>
> With BPF_REG_5, whose reg2hex is 0, the emitted
>
> 65 49 03 04 25 <off> add %gs:<off>,%rax
>
> adds the per-CPU offset to RAX rather than R8. The destination keeps
> the unadjusted address and RAX is clobbered, so the program goes on to
> dereference a pointer that was never made per-CPU:
>
> BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000607e386a8894
> RIP: bpf_prog_707837aafd2aa9ae_update_percpu_data+0x93/0xc9
> Call Trace:
> __bpf_prog_test_run_raw_tp+0x2dc/0x7d0
> __flush_smp_call_function_queue+0x1e9/0xc80
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
>
> R5 is the mildest of the four, aliasing a scratch register and faulting
> at the store. R7 aliases RBP and would corrupt the frame pointer, R8
> and R9 alias the argument registers.
>
> Use add_2mod() so the register goes through REX.R, matching how
> add_2reg() places it in ModRM.reg and how emit_priv_frame_ptr()
> hardcodes 0x4c for the same instruction with R9. Encodings for the
> non-extended registers are unchanged.
>
> Problem showed up when trying to resurrect BPF_GCC CI (selftests built
> with BPF_GCC).
>
> This has gone unnoticed because clang reloads the address into R1
> before each per-CPU access, so the destination is never an extended
> register. GCC keeps several per-CPU addresses live at once, and
> test_progs-bpf_gcc panics the kernel in global_percpu_data/init, where
> the address of a .percpu variable ends up in R5.
>
> Fixes: 7bdbf7446305 ("bpf: add special internal-only MOV instruction to resolve per-CPU addrs")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta@linux.dev>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Please don't drop acks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-14 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-14 20:32 [PATCH bpf v2 0/2] bpf, x86: fix per-CPU address resolution into an extended register Vineet Gupta
2026-08-14 20:32 ` [PATCH bpf v2 1/2] bpf, x86: Fix " Vineet Gupta
2026-08-14 20:44 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2026-08-14 21:20 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-14 21:30 ` Vineet Gupta
2026-08-14 20:32 ` [PATCH bpf v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Check per-CPU address resolution per register Vineet Gupta
2026-08-14 20:49 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-14 21:20 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-14 21:51 ` Vineet Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3338fd93155ac14b3b824ce232ae7be288072608.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vineet.gupta@linux.dev \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.