Re: 2.4.14-pre6

[Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>]

On Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:55:41 PM -0800 Andrew Morton
<akpm@zip.com.au> wrote:

> Oh.  I have a gripe concerning prune_icache().  The design
> idea behind keventd is that it's a "process context bottom
> half handler".  It's used for things like cardbus hotplug
> interrupt handlers, handling tty hangups, etc.  It should
> probably run SCHED_FIFO.
> 
> Using keventd to synchronously flush large amounts of 
> data out to disk constitutes gross abuse - it's being blocked
> from performing its designed duties for many seconds.  Can we
> please not do that?  We already have kswapd, kupdate, bdflush,
> which should be sufficient.

One of the worst parts of prune_icache was that if a journaled
FS needed to log dirty inodes, kswapd would wait on the log, who was
probably waiting on kswapd.  Thus the dirty_inode call, which I'd like to
get rid of.

I don't think kupdate or bdflush are suitable to flush the dirty inodes,
kupdate shouldn't do memory pressure and bdflush shouldn't wait on the log.
So how about a new kinoded?

-chris