From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
"Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] afs: proc cells and rootcell are writeable
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:31:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3349.1391128281@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3301.1391128114@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > I think this is a pretty strong argument. Counter-arguments, anybody?
> >
> > Yes. CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH.
>
> No, it would seem unlikely it's that, but I guess there's another capability
> override because the process is owned by root.
CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE, I think.
int generic_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
{
...
/*
* Read/write DACs are always overridable.
* Executable DACs are overridable when there is
* at least one exec bit set.
*/
if (!(mask & MAY_EXEC) || (inode->i_mode & S_IXUGO))
if (inode_capable(inode, CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE))
return 0;
...
}
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-31 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-26 12:27 [PATCH] afs: proc cells and rootcell are writeable David Howells
2014-01-26 19:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-26 20:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-26 20:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-26 20:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-28 8:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-01-28 12:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-28 12:17 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-01-28 12:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-28 17:34 ` Joe Perches
2014-01-28 20:20 ` David Howells
2014-01-28 20:27 ` Al Viro
2014-01-28 20:56 ` David Howells
2014-01-30 21:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-01-30 21:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-30 22:15 ` Pali Rohár
2014-01-30 22:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-30 22:36 ` Dave Jones
2014-01-30 22:33 ` Russ Allbery
2014-01-31 0:21 ` David Howells
2014-01-31 0:28 ` David Howells
2014-01-31 0:31 ` David Howells [this message]
2014-01-31 0:07 ` David Howells
2014-01-31 0:20 ` David Howells
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-01-27 12:33 Alexey Dobriyan
2013-11-20 13:30 Pali Rohár
2013-12-10 8:02 ` Pali Rohár
2013-12-16 7:00 ` Andrew Morton
2013-12-17 13:19 ` Pali Rohár
2013-12-17 18:31 ` David Howells
2013-12-31 9:59 ` Pali Rohár
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3349.1391128281@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.