From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Figa Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: EXYNOS: Use EXYNOS4210_GPEx instead of EXYNOS4_GPEx Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:52:23 +0200 Message-ID: <3351890.rVcxVBV0WB@amdc1227> References: <4648723.rWnut7F0uJ@amdc1227> <503D57EF.2090402@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from mailout1.samsung.com ([203.254.224.24]:30045 "EHLO mailout1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753710Ab2H2Nw3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:52:29 -0400 Received: from epcpsbgm2.samsung.com (epcpsbgm2 [203.254.230.27]) by mailout1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0M9I007NIRVB0A10@mailout1.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:52:27 +0900 (KST) Received: from amdc1227.localnet ([106.116.147.199]) by mmp1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01 (7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTPA id <0M9I00531RVC7GA0@mmp1.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 22:52:27 +0900 (KST) In-reply-to: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Kyungmin Park Cc: Kukjin Kim , Joonyoung Shim , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Linus Walleij , Grant Likely , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Marek Szyprowski Hi, On Wednesday 29 of August 2012 09:03:12 Kyungmin Park wrote: > On 8/29/12, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Please see my comments on Joonyoung Shim's previous patch... > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-May/101522.h > > tml > It's perference issue. some person like this style. others doesn't. > Moreever vender, System LSI, provided codes have whole different style. > It lists up whole gpios for each SoCs. > > EXYNOS4210_{A0, .... Z} > EXYNOS4412_{A0, .... V4} > EXYNOS5250_{A0, .... Z} > > anyway, just remain it as broken, and try to use pinctl as Thomas > mentioned. OK, I will drop this patchset for the time being. Let's get the pinctrl driver merged first and then investigate Exynos4x12 support in it. Best regards, -- Tomasz Figa Samsung Poland R&D Center From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: t.figa@samsung.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:52:23 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: EXYNOS: Use EXYNOS4210_GPEx instead of EXYNOS4_GPEx In-Reply-To: References: <4648723.rWnut7F0uJ@amdc1227> <503D57EF.2090402@samsung.com> Message-ID: <3351890.rVcxVBV0WB@amdc1227> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Wednesday 29 of August 2012 09:03:12 Kyungmin Park wrote: > On 8/29/12, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Please see my comments on Joonyoung Shim's previous patch... > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-May/101522.h > > tml > It's perference issue. some person like this style. others doesn't. > Moreever vender, System LSI, provided codes have whole different style. > It lists up whole gpios for each SoCs. > > EXYNOS4210_{A0, .... Z} > EXYNOS4412_{A0, .... V4} > EXYNOS5250_{A0, .... Z} > > anyway, just remain it as broken, and try to use pinctl as Thomas > mentioned. OK, I will drop this patchset for the time being. Let's get the pinctrl driver merged first and then investigate Exynos4x12 support in it. Best regards, -- Tomasz Figa Samsung Poland R&D Center