From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-in-08.arcor-online.net (mail-in-08.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.arcor.de", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F4BDDE36 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 01:46:11 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <467BE91F.1030003@ru.mvista.com> References: <1181729973.25586.31.camel@dolphin.spb.rtsoft.ru> <467176EB.7060404@ru.mvista.com> <6c416bf9f79a648fc82f64619aca86de@kernel.crashing.org> <20070615212016.GB18055@mag.az.mvista.com> <1182429443.24740.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> <467BE91F.1030003@ru.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <3372b921591ca9731d2703f04e6c35f1@kernel.crashing.org> From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] powerpc: MPC7450 L2 HW cache flush feature utilization Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 17:46:01 +0200 To: Vladislav Buzov Cc: linuxppc-dev list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Note that 745x processors have L3 cache installed and may have the same > problem requiring similar code modifications to use L3 hardware > flushing > mechanism. What does the erratum say? The L3 is a very different beast from the L2, IIRC it is a pure victim cache so it cannot have this problem at all? Segher