From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932634AbXCHSax (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:30:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932659AbXCHSaw (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:30:52 -0500 Received: from web36612.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.29]:37875 "HELO web36612.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932634AbXCHSaw (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2007 13:30:52 -0500 X-YMail-OSG: znqzP6AVM1n7Bkbi_WwhkiTviEx2KUKKv0ghBnUcic.2S42jDkEZyeSPpC1yMcXOtQWih.Ne4TTTBTlz7Ki6K19OTtHIq1QZWALXQd4SCCZKAsYuTKlyfpt.AGijrGrrjOud2eH1o3rGnQ-- X-RocketYMMF: rancidfat Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 10:30:51 -0800 (PST) From: Casey Schaufler Reply-To: casey@schaufler-ca.com Subject: Re: [RFC][Patch 1/6] integrity: new hooks To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: Mimi Zohar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, safford@watson.ibm.com, serue@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kjhall@linux.vnet.ibm.com, zohar@us.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <20070308170001.GA17304@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-ID: <33939.11500.qm@web36612.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- "Serge E. Hallyn" wrote: > It's unfortunate, agreed, but > > use of LSM as an integrity framework was also a > no-go. You're going to have to justify this assertion. I know of at least one work-in-progress for which LSM works just fine. Not to mention the Integrity claims of SELinux. Casey Schaufler casey@schaufler-ca.com