From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@linaro.org>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@gmail.com>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] IB/hns: Replace counting semaphore event_sem with wait_event
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:21:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3400101.E3rphEBHnx@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHv-k__yWEaBhNYqvdjZPFpVtMKGMC75_eMh7Y4V_=MNhtzMbw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 6:29:45 PM CEST Binoy Jayan wrote:
> On 25 October 2016 at 17:58, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 5:31:57 PM CEST Binoy Jayan wrote:
> >> static int __hns_roce_cmd_mbox_wait(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, u64 in_param,
> >> u64 out_param, unsigned long in_modifier,
> >> @@ -198,11 +218,12 @@ static int __hns_roce_cmd_mbox_wait(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, u64 in_param,
> >> struct hns_roce_cmdq *cmd = &hr_dev->cmd;
> >> struct device *dev = &hr_dev->pdev->dev;
> >> struct hns_roce_cmd_context *context;
> >> - int ret = 0;
> >> + int orig_free_head, ret = 0;
> >> +
> >> + wait_event(cmd->wq, (orig_free_head = atomic_free_node(cmd, -1)) != -1);
> >>
> >> spin_lock(&cmd->context_lock);
> >> - WARN_ON(cmd->free_head < 0);
> >> - context = &cmd->context[cmd->free_head];
> >> + context = &cmd->context[orig_free_head];
> >> context->token += cmd->token_mask + 1;
> >> cmd->free_head = context->next;
> >> spin_unlock(&cmd->context_lock);
> >>
> >
> > You get the lock in atomic_free_node() and then again right after that.
> > Why not combine the two and only take the lock inside of that
> > function that returns a context?
>
>
> Hi Arnd,
>
> I couldn't figure out a way to wait for a node to be free followed by
> acquiring a lock
> in an atomic fashion. If the lock is acquired after the wait_event,
> there could be race
> between the wait_event and acquiring the lock. If the lock is acquired
> before the
> wait_event, the process may goto sleep with the lock held which is not desired.
> Could you suggest me of some way to circumvent this?
Something like
static struct hns_roce_cmd_context *hns_roce_try_get_context(struct hns_roce_cmdq *cmd)
{
struct hns_roce_cmd_context *context = NULL;
spin_lock(&cmd->context_lock);
if (cmd->free_head < 0)
goto out;
context = &cmd->context[cmd->free_head];
... /* update free_head */
out:
spin_unlock(&cmd->context_lock);
return context;
}
...
static struct hns_roce_cmd_context *hns_roce_get_context(struct hns_roce_cmdq *cmd)
{
struct hns_roce_cmd_context *context;
wait_event(cmd->wq, (context = hns_roce_try_get_context(cmd)));
return context;
}
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-25 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-25 12:01 [PATCH v2 0/8] infiniband: Remove semaphores Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:01 ` Binoy Jayan
[not found] ` <1477396919-27669-1-git-send-email-binoy.jayan-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-25 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] IB/core: iwpm_nlmsg_request: Replace semaphore with completion Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:01 ` Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] IB/core: Replace semaphore sm_sem " Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:01 ` Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:43 ` Jack Wang
2016-10-25 15:08 ` Binoy Jayan
[not found] ` <CAHv-k_86z3MTYePPQcs5fWSqFeoGxt7UYG_b-SyZGQ7zVW-hSw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-25 15:48 ` Jack Wang
2016-10-25 15:48 ` Jack Wang
2016-10-25 15:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
[not found] ` <20161025154822.GA27240-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-25 20:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-25 20:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-25 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] IB/mthca: Replace counting semaphore event_sem with wait_event Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:01 ` Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] IB/mlx5: Add helper mlx5_ib_post_send_wait Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:01 ` Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-25 12:46 ` Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:46 ` Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:26 ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-10-25 13:16 ` Binoy Jayan
2016-10-27 6:05 ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-10-27 6:23 ` Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] IB/hns: Replace semaphore poll_sem with mutex Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] IB/mthca: " Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] IB/isert: Replace semaphore sem with completion Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] IB/hns: Replace counting semaphore event_sem with wait_event Binoy Jayan
[not found] ` <1477396919-27669-7-git-send-email-binoy.jayan-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-25 12:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-25 12:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-25 12:59 ` Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 13:21 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-10-25 13:35 ` Binoy Jayan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3400101.E3rphEBHnx@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=binoy.jayan@linaro.org \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=hal.rosenstock@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sean.hefty@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.