From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Cc: andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru, fengchengwen@huawei.com, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] mempool: test performance with larger bursts
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:22:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3407155.BzM5BlMlMQ@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F237@smartserver.smartshare.dk>
20/02/2024 14:49, Morten Brørup:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> > 24/01/2024 12:21, Morten Brørup:
> > > REGISTER_PERF_TEST(mempool_perf_autotest, test_mempool_perf);
> > > +REGISTER_PERF_TEST(mempool_perf_autotest_1core,
> > test_mempool_perf_1core);
> > > +REGISTER_PERF_TEST(mempool_perf_autotest_2cores,
> > test_mempool_perf_2cores);
> >
> > How do we make sure the test is skipped if we have only 1 core?
>
> Good point. Will fix in next version.
>
> >
> > > +REGISTER_PERF_TEST(mempool_perf_autotest_allcores,
> > test_mempool_perf_allcores);
> >
> > How the test duration is changed after this patch?
>
> On my test machine, the expanded test parameter set increased the duration of one test run from 20 minutes to 100 minutes.
> Before the patch, all three test runs were always executed, i.e. a total duration of 60 minutes.
>
> In other words:
> The expanded test parameter set increased the test run duration by factor five.
> Introducing the ability to optionally only test with a specific number of lcores reduced the total test duration to a third.
That's a very long test.
It would be interesting to find a way to make it shorter.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-21 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-21 4:52 [PATCH] mempool: test performance with larger bursts Morten Brørup
2024-01-22 7:10 ` fengchengwen
2024-01-22 14:34 ` [PATCH v2] " Morten Brørup
2024-01-24 2:41 ` fengchengwen
2024-01-24 8:58 ` [PATCH v3] " Morten Brørup
2024-01-24 9:10 ` [PATCH v4] " Morten Brørup
2024-01-24 11:21 ` [PATCH v5] " Morten Brørup
2024-02-18 18:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-02-20 13:49 ` Morten Brørup
2024-02-21 10:22 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2024-02-21 10:38 ` Morten Brørup
2024-02-21 10:40 ` Bruce Richardson
2024-02-20 14:01 ` [PATCH v6] " Morten Brørup
2024-03-02 20:04 ` [PATCH v7] " Morten Brørup
2024-04-04 9:26 ` Morten Brørup
2024-06-10 8:56 ` Morten Brørup
2024-06-18 13:21 ` Bruce Richardson
2024-06-18 13:48 ` Morten Brørup
2024-09-13 14:58 ` Morten Brørup
2024-09-16 12:40 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-09-16 13:08 ` Morten Brørup
2024-09-16 14:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-09-16 15:37 ` [PATCH v8] " Morten Brørup
2024-09-17 8:10 ` [PATCH v9] " Morten Brørup
2024-10-08 9:14 ` Morten Brørup
2024-10-11 12:50 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3407155.BzM5BlMlMQ@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.