From: Zirong Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, eguan@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: change return value check to golden image check
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:06:32 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <340759829.19718794.1455894392526.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160219013316.GW14668@dastard>
----- 原始邮件 -----
> 发件人: "Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit.com>
> 收件人: "Zorro Lang" <zlang@redhat.com>
> 抄送: fstests@vger.kernel.org, eguan@redhat.com
> 发送时间: 星期五, 2016年 2 月 19日 上午 9:33:16
> 主题: Re: [PATCH] xfs: change return value check to golden image check
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:37:36AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> > xfs/133 and xfs/138 use too much code to do "return value" check,
> > it's not necessary. For the code can be more readable and clear,
> > I change "return value" check to golden image check.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > tests/xfs/133 | 20 +++++++-------------
> > tests/xfs/133.out | 7 +++++++
> > tests/xfs/138 | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
> > tests/xfs/138.out | 12 ++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> This cause a xfs/133 failure like this on my systems:
>
> --- tests/xfs/133.out 2016-02-19 10:40:57.043131919 +1100
> +++ /home/dave/src/xfstests-dev/results//xfs/xfs/133.out.bad 2016-02-19
> 12:24:53.173589432 +1100
> @@ -4,5 +4,6 @@
> Filesystem Blocks Quota Limit Warn/Time Mounted on
> SCRATCH_DEV 0 102400 204800 00 [--------] SCRATCH_MNT
> === report command output ===
> +(null) 0 0 0 00 [--------]
> 123456-project 0 102400 204800 00 [--------]
>
>
> Can you see if you can reproduce it?
Hi Dave,
Thanks for review this patch:)
I can't reproduce that problem. It shows xfs_quota report one more strange
line, I can't sure what cause it by read xfs/133.
xfs/133 only set one project quota for 123456-project, I don't think it will
report one more project quota message.
I can add 'grep 123456-project' to make sure it will only report 123456-project.
But I can't do that before I sure that problem you met is not a xfsprogs bug.
So would you please give me more information about your test environment, especially
about xfs project quota?
I will do more exception test, try to reproduce it.
Thanks,
Zorro Lang
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-19 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-11 16:37 [PATCH] xfs: change return value check to golden image check Zorro Lang
2016-02-19 1:33 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-19 15:06 ` Zirong Lang [this message]
2016-02-21 0:18 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-19 15:35 ` Zirong Lang
2016-02-19 15:43 ` Zirong Lang
2016-02-19 15:58 ` Eric Sandeen
2016-02-19 16:35 ` Eric Sandeen
2016-02-19 16:52 ` Zirong Lang
2016-02-19 17:07 ` Zirong Lang
2016-02-19 17:16 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=340759829.19718794.1455894392526.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=zlang@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.