Re: [XEN PATCH] automation/eclair_analysis: substitute deprecated service

[Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@bugseng.com>]

On 2024-04-18 17:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 18.04.2024 17:00, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>> On 2024-04-18 09:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 17.04.2024 16:51, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>>>> --- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/toolchain.ecl
>>>> +++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/toolchain.ecl
>>>> @@ -44,8 +44,8 @@
>>>>  -doc_end
>>>> 
>>>>  -doc_begin="See Section \"6.19 Structures with No Members\" of
>>>> "GCC_MANUAL"."
>>>> --config=STD.emptrecd,behavior+={c99,GCC_ARM64,specified}
>>>> --config=STD.emptrecd,behavior+={c99,GCC_X86_64,specified}
>>>> +-config=STD.anonstct,behavior+={c99,GCC_ARM64,specified}
>>>> +-config=STD.anonstct,behavior+={c99,GCC_X86_64,specified}
>>>>  -doc_end
>>> 
>>> I'm irritated by this, which may be in part because of too terse a
>>> description.
>>> "emptrecd" looks like an abbreviation of "empty record" to me, in 
>>> line
>>> with
>>> "Structures with No Members". "anonstct" otoh looks an abbreviation 
>>> of
>>> "anonymous structures" to me, which is something different 
>>> (structures
>>> without
>>> names).
>> 
>> I'm afraid I can't do much about this. From a functionality standpoint
>> there is no difference for Xen.
> 
> What I'm pretty sure you can do is provide a patch description that
> allows readers to understand anything seemingly (or actually) 
> anomalous.
> 
> Jan

Ok

-- 
Nicola Vetrini, BSc
Software Engineer, BUGSENG srl (https://bugseng.com)