From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com ([95.142.166.194]:33186 "EHLO perceval.ideasonboard.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761528Ab2EJVpy (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 May 2012 17:45:54 -0400 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Sakari Ailus Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, s.nawrocki@samsung.com, t.stanislaws@samsung.com, hverkuil@xs4all.nl Subject: Re: [ANN] Selection API naming meeting #v4l-meeting next Monday Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 23:45:57 +0200 Message-ID: <3438748.kTlMYi3f8e@avalon> In-Reply-To: <20120510201849.GC3373@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> References: <20120510201849.GC3373@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Sakari, On Thursday 10 May 2012 23:18:49 Sakari Ailus wrote: > Hi all, > > Let's have a quick meeting 14:00 Finnish time (GMT + 3) next Monday on > #v4l-meeting on two topics: > > - Selection target naming. It has been proposed that the _ACTUAL / _ACTIVE > be removed and e.g. the crop targets would be then called > V4L2_SEL_TGT_CROP and V4L2_SUBDEV_SEL_TGT_CROP on V4L2 and subdve > interfaces, respectively. > > - Unifying selection targets on subdevs and V4L2 API. Currently the IDs of > mostly equivalent targets are the same, but there are subtle differences > between the targets in some cases. We still have documented everything > twice, even if the differences are subtle. Would it make sese to unify the > two, and just mention the differences? I'll be there. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart