From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 24 May 2002 02:08:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 24 May 2002 02:08:34 -0400 Received: from mail3.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.38]:40341 "EHLO mail3.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 24 May 2002 02:08:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 23:15:44 -0700 From: Hanna V Linder Reply-To: Hanna V Linder To: Austin Gonyou cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Recent kernel SMP scalability Benchmark/White-paper References. Message-ID: <345429561.1022195743@[10.10.2.2]> In-Reply-To: <1022213044.23882.35.camel@UberGeek> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.1 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --On Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:04 PM -0500 Austin Gonyou wrote: >> We have bi-weekly conference calls where anyone is welcome >> to join and ask questions or report your work or whatever. >> > > Kewl, I might just see if I can work that in. I saw the LSE, but the Great. > documentation out there hadn't been updated in quite some time as well. I have updated some 8-way kernel comparisons running dbench as recently as a couple weeks ago. Although, I do not know of any specific Linux(TM) vs Solaris(TM) benchmark results on the lse web site. ;) What benchmark would reflect your workload? Speaking of OLS, Is there any interest in an lse-tech BOF or get- to-gether of some sort in Ottawa this summer? It would be nice to put some more faces to names from the conference calls. >> >> Hanna Linder >> IBM Linux Technology Center >> > Would that be the ^^^ one here in tx? Same LTC, different state. The LTC engineers live all over the world. I know some of the guys in Austin... Hanna