From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Erich Focht <efocht@ess.nec.de>, Michael Hohnbaum <hohnbaum@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>, Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NUMA scheduler BK tree
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 11:40:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <347990000.1037648441@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200211061734.42713.efocht@ess.nec.de>
> in order to make it easier to keep up with the main Linux tree I've
> set up a bitkeeper repository with our NUMA scheduler at
> bk://numa-ef.bkbits.net/numa-sched
> (Web view: http://numa-ef.bkbits.net/)
> This used to contain my node affine NUMA scheduler, I'll add extra
> trees when the additional patches for that are tested on top of our
> NUMA scheduler.
>
> Is it ok for you to have it this way or would you prefer having the
> core and the initial load balancer separate?
>
> The tree is currently in sync with bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5 and
> I'll try to keep so.
BTW, can you keep producing normal patches too, when you do an update?
I don't use bitkeeper ...
Thanks,
Martin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-18 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-06 16:34 NUMA scheduler BK tree Erich Focht
2002-11-06 18:10 ` Michael Hohnbaum
2002-11-07 23:05 ` Erich Focht
2002-11-07 23:46 ` Michael Hohnbaum
2002-11-08 16:57 ` Erich Focht
2002-11-11 15:13 ` [PATCH 2.5.47] NUMA scheduler (1/2) Erich Focht
2002-11-11 15:14 ` [PATCH 2.5.47] NUMA scheduler (2/2) Erich Focht
2002-11-12 0:24 ` [PATCH 2.5.47] NUMA scheduler (1/2) Michael Hohnbaum
2002-11-18 19:40 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2002-11-19 16:26 ` [PATCH 2.5.48] " Erich Focht
2002-11-19 16:27 ` [PATCH 2.5.48] NUMA scheduler (2/2) Erich Focht
2002-12-02 15:29 ` [PATCH 2.5.50] NUMA scheduler (1/2) Erich Focht
2002-12-02 15:30 ` [PATCH 2.5.50] NUMA scheduler (2/2) Erich Focht
2002-12-06 17:39 ` [PATCH 2.5.50] NUMA scheduler (1/2) Michael Hohnbaum
2002-12-18 16:21 ` [PATCH 2.5.52] " Erich Focht
2002-12-18 16:23 ` [PATCH 2.5.52] NUMA scheduler (2/2) Erich Focht
2002-12-20 14:49 ` [PATCH 2.5.52] NUMA scheduler: cputimes stats Erich Focht
2002-12-20 15:17 ` [PATCH 2.5.52] NUMA scheduler (1/2) Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-20 17:44 ` Erich Focht
2002-12-31 13:29 ` [PATCH 2.5.53] NUMA scheduler (1/3) Erich Focht
2002-12-31 13:29 ` [PATCH 2.5.53] NUMA scheduler (2/3) Erich Focht
2002-12-31 13:30 ` [PATCH 2.5.53] NUMA scheduler (3/3) Erich Focht
2003-01-04 1:58 ` [PATCH 2.5.53] NUMA scheduler (1/3) Michael Hohnbaum
2003-01-05 5:35 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-06 3:58 ` Michael Hohnbaum
2003-01-06 6:07 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-07 2:23 ` Michael Hohnbaum
2003-01-07 11:27 ` Erich Focht
2003-01-07 23:35 ` Michael Hohnbaum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=347990000.1037648441@flay \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=efocht@ess.nec.de \
--cc=hohnbaum@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.