From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] crypto: drbg - lower reseed threshold if seed source is degraded
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 17:22:32 +0200
Message-ID: <3482320.MoAVfHitsv@tachyon.chronox.de>
References: <1546948.ChzZZVGUza@tachyon.chronox.de> <20150609142524.GA14316@gondor.apana.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: andreas.steffen@strongswan.org, Ted Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
	sandyinchina@gmail.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Return-path: <linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.eperm.de ([89.247.134.16]:46179 "EHLO mail.eperm.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752495AbbFIPWo (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 9 Jun 2015 11:22:44 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20150609142524.GA14316@gondor.apana.org.au>
Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org>

Am Dienstag, 9. Juni 2015, 22:25:25 schrieb Herbert Xu:

Hi Herbert,

> 
> Anyway, I'm happy to apply this.  However, the patch is corrupted
> so please resend it without the white-space damage/line wrapping.

As this patch would clash with the async seeding patch, shall I develop this 
patch on top of your async patch set?
> 
> Thanks,


-- 
Ciao
Stephan