From: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Shi Hao <i.shihao.999@gmail.com>,
Michael.Hennerich@analog.com, lars@metafoo.de,
dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: adt7316: replace sprintf() with sysfs_emit()
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 08:18:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <34a55901fe0729145097d287a98746f23eea13d8.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251116152800.4c1849cc@jic23-huawei>
On Sun, 2025-11-16 at 15:28 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Nov 2025 13:08:07 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 16, 2025 at 12:16 PM Shi Hao <i.shihao.999@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Convert several sprintf() calls to sysfs_emit() in the
> > > sysfs show functions, as it is the preferred helper and
> > > prevents potential buffer overruns.
> > >
> > > No functional changes intended.
> >
> > I briefly looked at it and see no issues,
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
> >
>
> Applied, but I will note that this driver is a long way from suitable
> for moving out of staging and I would be surprised if more than
> one or two of the lines changed in this patch make it through the
> necessary refactors (should anyone actually have another go at
> doing them). Anyhow, I still think this is worth taking just to
> reduce the noise of remaining instances of this.
>
> I'd have deleted this long ago except I actually have one somewhere
> and it one of the supported parts was still listed as suitable for
> new designs when I checked not long ago.
Seems to be now "just" in production. So no longer advised for new designs. I gave a
quick look and this is far from being a simple driver. It would require a fair amount
of work to bring it out of staging. So, are there users relying on staging drivers?
But I would assume that for staging we are still free to drop support it?
>
> ADI folk, I would like to hear if we should just delete this one.
I guess Michael is the best person to answer this question.
- Nuno Sá
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-18 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-16 10:16 [PATCH] staging: iio: adt7316: replace sprintf() with sysfs_emit() Shi Hao
2025-11-16 11:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-16 15:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-18 8:18 ` Nuno Sá [this message]
2025-11-18 12:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-19 14:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-01 16:51 ` Marcelo Schmitt
2025-12-02 13:55 ` Nuno Sá
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=34a55901fe0729145097d287a98746f23eea13d8.camel@gmail.com \
--to=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=i.shihao.999@gmail.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.