All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	jose.marchesi@oracle.com, kernel-team@fb.com,
	martin.lau@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, clm@meta.com,
	ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/24] bpf: Reject stack arguments in non-JITed programs
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 09:42:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <34cf5402-a168-45ba-8d71-b33130da2bc7@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7cbf61dc320a82fb5fa7e60ca9422b59c2d679468a17288ca0d35c0e8e5fc11a@mail.kernel.org>



On 5/11/26 8:19 AM, bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote:
>> bpf: Reject stack arguments in non-JITed programs
> This isn't a bug, but should this commit include a Fixes: tag? This
> appears to be fixing an issue introduced by commit 3330ee8db989
> ("bpf: Support stack arguments for bpf functions").

There is no need for fix tag. At this point, r11 based
insns are rejected by verifier. So nothing to fix.

>
>> The interpreter does not understand the bpf register r11
>> (BPF_REG_PARAMS) used for stack arguments. So reject interpreter
>> usage if stack arguments are used either in the main program or
>> any subprogram.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
>> index ae10b9ca018d..958d86f0beac 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
>> @@ -2599,7 +2599,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *__bpf_prog_select_runtime(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct
>>   		goto finalize;
>>
>>   	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON) ||
>> -	    bpf_prog_has_kfunc_call(fp))
>> +	    bpf_prog_has_kfunc_call(fp) || (env && env->subprog_info[0].stack_arg_cnt))
>>   		jit_needed = true;
>>
>>   	if (!bpf_prog_select_interpreter(fp))
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/fixups.c b/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
>> index ba86039789fd..19056016eed8 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
>> @@ -1407,6 +1407,12 @@ int bpf_fixup_call_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
>>   		verbose(env, "calling kernel functions are not allowed in non-JITed programs\n");
>>   		return -EINVAL;
>>   	}
>> +	for (i = 1; i < env->subprog_cnt; i++) {
>> +		if (bpf_in_stack_arg_cnt(&env->subprog_info[i])) {
>> +			verbose(env, "stack args are not supported in non-JITed programs\n");
>> +			return -EINVAL;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>>   	if (env->subprog_cnt > 1 && env->prog->aux->tail_call_reachable) {
>>   		/* When JIT fails the progs with bpf2bpf calls and tail_calls
>>   		 * have to be rejected, since interpreter doesn't support them yet.
> ---
> AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
> See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
>
> CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/25652623893


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-11 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-11  5:33 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/24] bpf: Support stack arguments for BPF functions and kfuncs Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  5:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/24] bpf: Convert bpf_get_spilled_reg macro to static inline function Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  5:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/24] bpf: Remove copy_register_state wrapper function Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  5:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/24] bpf: Add helper functions for r11-based stack argument insns Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  5:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/24] bpf: Set sub->arg_cnt earlier in btf_prepare_func_args() Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  6:19   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-11 16:29     ` Yonghong Song
2026-05-11 17:18       ` Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  5:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/24] bpf: Support stack arguments for bpf functions Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  6:19   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-11 15:46     ` Yonghong Song
2026-05-11 16:05       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-05-11 16:21         ` Yonghong Song
2026-05-12  4:17         ` Yonghong Song
2026-05-12 16:23           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-05-11  5:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/24] bpf: Refactor jmp history to use dedicated spi/frame fields Yonghong Song
2026-05-11 16:17   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-05-11 16:33     ` Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  5:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/24] bpf: Add precision marking and backtracking for stack argument slots Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  6:19   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-11  5:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/24] bpf: Refactor record_call_access() to extract per-arg logic Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  5:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/24] bpf: Extend liveness analysis to track stack argument slots Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  6:19   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-11 16:35     ` Yonghong Song
2026-05-11 16:34   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-05-11 16:40     ` Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  5:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/24] bpf: Reject stack arguments in non-JITed programs Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  6:19   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-11 16:42     ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-05-11  5:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/24] bpf: Prepare architecture JIT support for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  5:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/24] bpf: Enable r11 based insns Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  5:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 13/24] bpf: Support stack arguments for kfunc calls Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  5:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 14/24] bpf: Reject stack arguments if tail call reachable Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  6:19   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-11  5:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 15/24] bpf: Pass bpf_subprog_info to bpf_int_jit_compile() Yonghong Song
2026-05-11 16:38   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-05-11 16:47     ` Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  5:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 16/24] bpf,x86: Implement JIT support for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-05-11 16:39   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-05-11 16:47     ` Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  5:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 17/24] selftests/bpf: Add tests for BPF function " Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  5:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 18/24] selftests/bpf: Add tests for stack argument validation Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  5:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 19/24] selftests/bpf: Add BTF fixup for __naked subprog parameter names Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  5:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 20/24] selftests/bpf: Add verifier tests for stack argument validation Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  6:19   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-11 16:49     ` Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  5:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 21/24] selftests/bpf: Add precision backtracking test for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  5:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 22/24] bpf, arm64: Map BPF_REG_0 to x8 instead of x7 Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  5:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 23/24] bpf, arm64: Add JIT support for stack arguments Yonghong Song
2026-05-11  5:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 24/24] selftests/bpf: Enable stack argument tests for arm64 Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=34cf5402-a168-45ba-8d71-b33130da2bc7@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=clm@meta.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.