From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [RFC] examples: remove l3fwd-vf example Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 19:08:50 +0200 Message-ID: <3527832.xFxZ2Khfjf@xps13> References: <1436860647-5862-1-git-send-email-jingjing.wu@intel.com> <2596501.YiU0Cqygmx@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: "Zhang, Helin" Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B6AFC350 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 19:10:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so144521426wib.1 for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 10:10:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-08-03 17:02, Zhang, Helin: > I don't think so, as l3fwd cannot support all cases quite well at this moment. > Can we targeting to do that in R2.2? OK, thanks > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > > Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 9:55 AM > > To: Zhang, Helin > > Cc: Liu, Yong; Cao, Waterman; dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] examples: remove l3fwd-vf example > > > > Any news? > > Can we remove it from version 2.1? > > > > 2015-07-22 14:51, Zhang, Helin: > > > Marvin/Waterman > > > > > > Could you help to check if l3fwd is good enough for all cases (1g/10/40g, PF and > > VF, single queue/multiple queue)? > > > We aim to remove l3fwd-vf to reduce an example application which is not so > > necessary. > > > Thank you! > > > > > > Regards, > > > Helin