From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gloria.sntech.de (gloria.sntech.de [185.11.138.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08AFA1946B8 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2024 08:19:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727857197; cv=none; b=nOuX8MNWVyXBzLbqIuYowc2Yr4yUs4UYa+uFUQ6UkcOv5pce771OswmTMrm7jI4KtMJwQEmcMK2JsBVoBx+LzZHsjcn8shmoBbwA6JBGVTucpEOA/4dFZR0fOK7Hpy5ynxE8i4NqfC1O2J++OWZpafzviYjoPyinNugpFXEoGTo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727857197; c=relaxed/simple; bh=d1WXcQKJYOHTURZhqznxS3US8Zodokf/EL9EGxHee7g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=sA5fbRVjxpwywjj8jR+Um3s5vvhhCa42gb08ozXuTSGFfISM0MiSZRsDTkJpfBxRiOeXXK7ZCCfVU7eAyMAzL4UD7A2xYhJssgKEXngXSCOkTL9RwZtVUyVrA1zfON+ceGZ+bBIHZG1pLnQ5xM+H3X/01UDTGVkXDuen4JMwTtQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b=re9fZa9p; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b="re9fZa9p" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sntech.de; s=gloria202408; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=xYKJrN9v9QzrVQiwlfgXCf7g7VyXIAwpe9m65hJOiGI=; b=re9fZa9pOJMGNtcghuSWvrxMrg dB2vNTOmdYQpbU0SCeLD/ZZszh4kIctDPO9IdBhYca0Xp8RpCjLsGPcETkLBE/8M1uyGLOV2SyXGp D41ElQ3L0VkuHpBpY9uk3nIFy4PknNCLWeF1BXutWRVES60GKCPssv43vto+pJ20T9/GeAy8qOa9C SPfNN03DNSqqK3nJnE2LI8M0QNFbAE5at0BHo2U4fQ+Mez0HLS14USfYaDlQ/UMERb84uuPZnzAbO UVdq9T1GS/HHaPvMM3HocBW/EnA1K1ZZoOgjX5SaP67+t39a26CBWUMC5TRG6sE04N+EU5CTPxHHn ocMo4sWw==; Received: from i53875aa1.versanet.de ([83.135.90.161] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1svuaN-0003AH-Kq; Wed, 02 Oct 2024 10:19:51 +0200 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= To: Geert Uytterhoeven , kernel test robot Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Linux Memory Management List Subject: Re: [linux-next:master 969/1347] arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-sapphire-excavator.dtb: /i2c@ff110000/rt5651@1a: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['realtek,rt5651'] Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 10:19:50 +0200 Message-ID: <3530812.QJadu78ljV@diego> In-Reply-To: <202410020004.4imQt5MT-lkp@intel.com> References: <202410020004.4imQt5MT-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi, Am Dienstag, 1. Oktober 2024, 18:25:27 CEST schrieb kernel test robot: > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master > head: 77df9e4bb2224d8ffbddec04c333a9d7965dad6c > commit: 577b5761679da90e691acc939ebbe7879fff5f31 [969/1347] arm64: dts: rockchip: Fix rt5651 compatible value on rk3399-sapphire-excavator > config: arm64-randconfig-051-20241001 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241002/202410020004.4imQt5MT-lkp@intel.com/config) > compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 > dtschema version: 2024.10.dev4+g577c1ab > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241002/202410020004.4imQt5MT-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410020004.4imQt5MT-lkp@intel.com/ > > dtcheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi:530.26-564.4: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /usb@fe800000: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi:566.26-600.4: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /usb@fe900000: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi:2063.25-2102.4: Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /dsi@ff960000: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges", "dma-ranges" or child "reg" property > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi:2104.26-2144.4: Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /dsi@ff968000: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges", "dma-ranges" or child "reg" property > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-base.dtsi:2180.20-2182.6: Warning (graph_child_address): /dp@ff970000/ports/port@1: graph node has single child node 'endpoint@0', #address-cells/#size-cells are not necessary > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-sapphire-excavator.dtb: /dp@fec00000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['rockchip,rk3399-cdn-dp'] > >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-sapphire-excavator.dtb: /i2c@ff110000/rt5651@1a: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['realtek,rt5651'] > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-sapphire-excavator.dtb: /syscon@ff770000/pcie-phy: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['rockchip,rk3399-pcie-phy'] > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-sapphire-excavator.dtb: /phy@ff7c0000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['rockchip,rk3399-typec-phy'] > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-sapphire-excavator.dtb: /phy@ff800000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['rockchip,rk3399-typec-phy'] Similar to the other board, the rt5651 binding hasn't been converted to yaml yet, but exists as txt binding. Geerts patch fixed the wrong vendor prefix (rockchip -> realtek)