From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F96C6A66B for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 16:37:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Jun 2013 09:37:51 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,838,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="351175627" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.122.12]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Jun 2013 09:37:50 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Eric =?ISO-8859-1?Q?B=E9nard?= Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 17:37:48 +0100 Message-ID: <3535914.EF08dTn6M4@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.10.3 (Linux/3.8.0-23-generic; KDE/4.10.3; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20130610151356.16549ecd@e6520eb> References: <20130610151356.16549ecd@e6520eb> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: qt4-embedded - image size X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 16:37:59 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" On Monday 10 June 2013 15:13:56 Eric B=E9nard wrote: > Le Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:07:01 +0200, > Nicolas Dechesne a =E9crit : > > thanks for your answer. so, yes I kind of figured out I could do th= at. But > > in fact I was hoping that re-using the existing packagegroup from o= e-core > > *should* be the right thing to do, instead of re-implementing anoth= er one. > > and perhaps the packagegroup being called core-qt4e should be restr= icted > > to 'core' components, and we could have 1 (or more) additional > > packagegroups that could be pulled into images, instead? otherwise = what's > > the point of having a 'core QT4e packagegroup' if it's not suitable= for > > any real usage? >=20 > true, I'll cook & test a split of the packagegroup to make the exampl= es > & demos optional This sounds like a good idea.=20 FWIW, the contents of this packagegroup came up on IRC a week or two ag= o and=20 it was pointed out that the main package includes qt4-embedded which pu= lls in=20 everything, but also includes a subset of the qt4-embedded-* packages a= nd=20 having both seems a bit pointless. I did test removing qt4-embedded fro= m the=20 packagegroup to see what would be removed from a qt4e-demo-image;=20 unfortunately I don't seem to have the buildhistory output to hand, but= IIRC=20 it didn't seem to me that anything we would have needed was being remov= ed. Cheers, Paul --=20 Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre