From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Richard Leitner <dev@g0hl1n.net>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: ioc4: simplify wave period measurement in clock_calibrate
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:46:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3564575.fggPKDmMEE@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141208162810.7b009382@frodo>
On Monday 08 December 2014 16:28:10 Richard Leitner wrote:
> The loop for measuring the square wave periods over some cycles is
> refactored to be more easily readable. This includes avoiding a
> "by-hand-implemented" for loop with a "real" one and adding some
> comments.
>
> Furthermore the following compiler warning is avoided by this patch:
> drivers/misc/ioc4.c: In function ‘ioc4_probe’:
> drivers/misc/ioc4.c:194:16: warning: ‘start’ may be used uninitialized
> in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> period = (end - start) /
> ^
> drivers/misc/ioc4.c:148:11: note: ‘start’ was declared here
> uint64_t start, end, period;
> ^
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Leitner <dev@g0hl1n.net>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> A simplification of this loop was suggested by Andrew Morton [1].
> This is my first proposal of such a simplification.
>
> Furthermore I'm not sure if the commit message is sufficient.
> Please give me also some feedback on it.
>
> If this simplification is not needed only initializing start to
> ktime_get_ns() would fix the compiler warning too.
With the changed loop, do you still get a warning if you
remove the extra 'start = ktime_get_ns()' at the start of the loop?
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-08 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-08 12:27 [PATCH] misc: ioc4: fix variable may be used uninitialized warning Richard Leitner
2014-12-08 12:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-08 13:18 ` Richard Leitner
2014-12-08 13:34 ` Prabhakar Lad
2014-12-08 15:28 ` [PATCH] misc: ioc4: simplify wave period measurement in clock_calibrate Richard Leitner
2014-12-08 15:46 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-12-08 15:58 ` Richard Leitner
2014-12-08 15:54 ` Paul Bolle
2014-12-08 21:03 ` Richard Leitner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3564575.fggPKDmMEE@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dev@g0hl1n.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.