From: Gang Li <gang.li@linux.dev>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] hugetlb: parallelize hugetlb page init on boot
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2023 14:24:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3592af35-83c6-4941-a4fc-e8a5ff06218d@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76becfc1-e609-e3e8-2966-4053143170b6@google.com>
On 2023/12/25 13:21, David Rientjes wrote:
> With that, I compared "hugepagesz=1G hugepages=11776" before and after on
> a 12TB host with eight NUMA nodes.
>
> Compared to 77s of total initialization time before, with this series I
> measured 18.3s.
>
> Feel free to add this into the changelog once the initialization issues
> are fixed up and I'm happy to ack it.
>
> Thanks!
Cool! Thank you ;)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-25 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-08 2:52 [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] hugetlb: parallelize hugetlb page init on boot Gang Li
2023-12-08 2:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] hugetlb: code clean for hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages Gang Li
2023-12-08 2:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] hugetlb: split hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages Gang Li
2023-12-08 2:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] padata: dispatch works on different nodes Gang Li
2023-12-12 23:40 ` Tim Chen
2023-12-18 6:46 ` Gang Li
2023-12-27 10:33 ` Gang Li
2023-12-08 2:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] hugetlb: parallelize 2M hugetlb allocation and initialization Gang Li
2023-12-08 2:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] hugetlb: parallelize 1G hugetlb initialization Gang Li
2023-12-08 2:56 ` [PATCH 1/1] hugetlb: add timing to hugetlb allocations on boot Gang Li
2023-12-12 20:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] hugetlb: parallelize hugetlb page init " Mike Kravetz
2023-12-21 7:22 ` Gang Li
2023-12-12 22:14 ` David Rientjes
2023-12-12 23:08 ` Mike Kravetz
2023-12-13 0:10 ` David Rientjes
2023-12-18 6:34 ` Gang Li
2023-12-22 4:33 ` David Rientjes
2023-12-25 5:21 ` David Rientjes
2023-12-25 6:24 ` Gang Li [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3592af35-83c6-4941-a4fc-e8a5ff06218d@linux.dev \
--to=gang.li@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.