From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pmladek@suse.com,
marco.crivellari@suse.com, gustavold@gmail.com,
david.dai@linux.dev, kernel-team@meta.com, tj@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] workqueue: build percpu pwqs through the attrs path
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 07:29:45 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <35e5c7afa2d90310ceba68cb1c5064c8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aqKCaEe5mcYjv6vB@gmail.com>
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 03:13:15AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> Sure. Would a if() in put_pwq() cause harm? This is what I came up with.
> Any chance it would be acceptable?
A failed system workqueue allocation hits BUG_ON() in workqueue_init_early()
anyway. Please use BUG_ON(!pwq_release_worker) with a comment explaining why
the failure is unrecoverable.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-19 14:37 [PATCH 0/5] workqueue: unify percpu and unbound pwq allocation Breno Leitao
2026-08-19 14:37 ` [PATCH 1/5] workqueue: move the unbound-only attrs check to apply_workqueue_attrs() Breno Leitao
2026-08-19 14:37 ` [PATCH 2/5] workqueue: resolve the backing pool in alloc_pwq() Breno Leitao
2026-08-19 14:37 ` [PATCH 3/5] workqueue: make the default pwq optional Breno Leitao
2026-08-26 8:22 ` Marco Crivellari
2026-08-26 16:33 ` Breno Leitao
2026-08-19 14:37 ` [PATCH 4/5] workqueue: build percpu pwqs through the attrs path Breno Leitao
2026-08-31 22:23 ` Tejun Heo
2026-09-10 10:13 ` Breno Leitao
2026-09-10 17:29 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-08-19 14:37 ` [PATCH 5/5] workqueue: rename the pwq slot helpers shared with percpu Breno Leitao
2026-08-31 22:11 ` [PATCH 0/5] workqueue: unify percpu and unbound pwq allocation Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=35e5c7afa2d90310ceba68cb1c5064c8@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=david.dai@linux.dev \
--cc=gustavold@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.