From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1bfwNV-0007By-1m for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 21:52:01 +0000 Subject: Re: Throughput weirdness on 9984 References: From: Ben Greear Message-ID: <35fa0be2-6ac6-0f7f-cb4e-e8bfced4199c@candelatech.com> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 14:51:17 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Alexis Green , ath10k@lists.infradead.org On 09/02/2016 02:11 PM, Alexis Green wrote: > Hello, > > As I was working with ath10k drivers, I have discovered that only CT > firmware/driver combination is able to report tx_info to mac80211 > layer. I've built latest LEDE image for my hardware (Netgear Nighthawk > X4S R7800) with both ath10k-ct driver from Ben and CT firmware. This > combination of software provides the data I need, however, the > throughput is severely limited :/ > > All tests are performed between two of these devices in mesh mode with > no encryption. Here are some of the iperf results: I have not actually tested mesh-mode on my firmware, so maybe I caused regressions related to that. If you use AP + STA config, is throughput better? What about IBSS? What tx/rx rates is CT firmware actually reporting? Maybe it is not enabling HT/VHT for some reason? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k