From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
gaetan.rivet@6wind.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dev: don't remove devargs that are still referenced
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 13:46:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3623854.KDShfdj67N@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <db643517-a8d3-2341-79e4-45e76fb3f090@redhat.com>
23/11/2018 18:04, Maxime Coquelin:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/23/18 4:43 PM, Darek Stojaczyk wrote:
> > Even if a device failed to plug, it's still a device
> > object that references the devargs. Those devargs will
> > be freed automatically together with the device, but
> > freeing them any earlier - like it's done in the hotplug
> > error handling path right now - will give us a dangling
> > pointer and a segfault scenario.
> >
> > Consider the following case:
> > * secondary process receives the hotplug request IPC message
> > * devargs are either created or updated
> > * the bus is scanned
> > * a new device object is created with the latest devargs
> > * the device can't be plugged for whatever reason,
> > bus->plug returns error
> > * the devargs are freed, even though they're still referenced
> > by the device object on the bus
> >
> > For PCI devices, the generic device name comes from
> > a buffer within the devargs. Freeing those will make
> > EAL segfault whenever the device name is checked.
> >
> > This patch just prevents the hotplug error handling
> > path from removing the devargs when there's a device
> > that references them. This is done by simply exiting
> > early from the hotplug function. As mentioned in the
> > beginning, those devargs will be freed later, together
> > with the device itself.
> >
> > Fixes: 7e8b26650146 ("eal: fix hotplug add / remove")
>
> Should you also cc stable?
> Above commit is in since v17.08.
>
> > Cc: gaetan.rivet@6wind.com
> > Cc: thomas@monjalon.net
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Applied (with rebase), thanks
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-25 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-21 18:37 [PATCH] dev: don't remove devargs that are still referenced Darek Stojaczyk
2018-11-21 18:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-11-21 19:38 ` [PATCH v2] " Darek Stojaczyk
2018-11-22 9:54 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2018-11-22 12:54 ` Stojaczyk, Dariusz
2018-11-23 15:43 ` [PATCH v3] " Darek Stojaczyk
2018-11-23 17:04 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-11-23 21:45 ` Stojaczyk, Dariusz
2018-11-25 12:46 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3623854.KDShfdj67N@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gaetan.rivet@6wind.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.