From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Tal Shnaiderman <talshn@nvidia.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
stable@dpdk.org, Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@nvidia.com>,
Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] common/mlx5: split relaxed ordering set for read and write
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 19:04:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3639485.kFSM30kCNj@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MW2PR12MB24922A2FA95E3857F53C45C1DF110@MW2PR12MB2492.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
03/11/2020 10:15, Matan Azrad:
> From: Tal Shnaiderman
> > The current DevX implementation of the relaxed ordering feature is enabling
> > relaxed ordering usage only if both relaxed ordering read AND write are
> > supported. In that case both relaxed ordering read and write are activated.
> >
> > This commit will optimize the usage of relaxed ordering by enabling it when
> > the read OR write features are supported. Each relaxed ordering type will be
> > activated according to its own capability bit.
> >
> > This will align the DevX flow with the verbs implementation of ibv_reg_mr
> > when using the flag IBV_ACCESS_RELAXED_ORDERING
> >
> > Fixes: 53ac93f71ad1 ("net/mlx5: create relaxed ordering memory regions")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tal Shnaiderman <talshn@nvidia.com>
> Acked-by: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>
Applied, thanks
Note: adding "PCI" to distinguish from memory relaxed ordering.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-04 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-30 12:26 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] common/mlx5: split relaxed ordering set for read and write Tal Shnaiderman
2020-11-03 8:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Tal Shnaiderman
2020-11-03 9:15 ` Matan Azrad
2020-11-04 18:04 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3639485.kFSM30kCNj@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=shahafs@nvidia.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=talshn@nvidia.com \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.