From: Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <westeri@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
"open list:GPIO ACPI SUPPORT" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO ACPI SUPPORT" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:INPUT (KEYBOARD, MOUSE, JOYSTICK,
TOUCHSCREEN)..." <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] Input: Don't send fake button presses to wake system
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 12:53:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <363c2b92-4bfc-4537-9fca-025eef09526f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <rn2kp5tog2agvswva2ipqq2ytiqdcgccnocudsg6ckwfh4roei@provk2g6dita>
On 6/26/25 12:44 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Mario,
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 06:33:08AM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/26/25 3:35 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi Mario,
>>>
>>> On 25-Jun-25 23:58, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>>> From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>>>>
>>>> Sending an input event to wake a system does wake it, but userspace picks
>>>> up the keypress and processes it. This isn't the intended behavior as it
>>>> causes a suspended system to wake up and then potentially turn off if
>>>> userspace is configured to turn off on power button presses.
>>>>
>>>> Instead send a PM wakeup event for the PM core to handle waking the system.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>
>>>> Fixes: 0f107573da417 ("Input: gpio_keys - handle the missing key press event in resume phase")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c | 7 +------
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c
>>>> index 773aa5294d269..4c6876b099c43 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c
>>>> @@ -420,12 +420,7 @@ static irqreturn_t gpio_keys_gpio_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
>>>> pm_stay_awake(bdata->input->dev.parent);
>>>> if (bdata->suspended &&
>>>> (button->type == 0 || button->type == EV_KEY)) {
>>>> - /*
>>>> - * Simulate wakeup key press in case the key has
>>>> - * already released by the time we got interrupt
>>>> - * handler to run.
>>>> - */
>>>> - input_report_key(bdata->input, button->code, 1);
>>>> + pm_wakeup_event(bdata->input->dev.parent, 0);
>
> There is already pm_stay_awake() above.
But that doesn't help with the fact that userspace gets KEY_POWER from
this and reacts to it.
>
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>
>>> Hmm, we have the same problem on many Bay Trail / Cherry Trail
>>> windows 8 / win10 tablets, so this has been discussed before and e.g.
>>> Android userspace actually needs the button-press (evdev) event to not
>>> immediately go back to sleep, so a similar patch has been nacked in
>>> the past.
>>>
>>> At least for GNOME this has been fixed in userspace by ignoring
>>> power-button events the first few seconds after a resume from suspend.
>>>
>>
>> The default behavior for logind is:
>>
>> HandlePowerKey=poweroff
>>
>> Can you share more about what version of GNOME has a workaround?
>> This was actually GNOME (on Ubuntu 24.04) that I found this issue.
>>
>> Nonetheless if this is dependent on an Android userspace problem could we
>> perhaps conditionalize it on CONFIG_ANDROID_BINDER_DEVICES?
>
> No it is not only Android, other userspace may want to distinguish
> between normal and "dark" resume based on keyboard or other user
> activity.
>
> Thanks.
>
In this specific case does the key passed up to satisfy this userspace
requirement and keep it awake need to specifically be a fabricated
KEY_POWER?
Or could we find a key that doesn't require some userspace to ignore
KEY_POWER?
Maybe something like KEY_RESERVED, KEY_FN, or KEY_POWER2?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-26 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-25 21:58 [PATCH v3 0/4] Fix soc-button-array debounce Mario Limonciello
2025-06-25 21:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] gpiolib: acpi: Add a helper for programming debounce Mario Limonciello
2025-06-26 14:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-26 16:04 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-25 21:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] gpiolib: acpi: Program debounce when finding GPIO Mario Limonciello
2025-06-26 14:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-25 21:58 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] Input: Don't program hw debounce for soc_button_array devices Mario Limonciello
2025-06-26 8:27 ` Hans de Goede
2025-06-26 14:33 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-25 21:58 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] Input: Don't send fake button presses to wake system Mario Limonciello
2025-06-26 8:35 ` Hans de Goede
2025-06-26 11:33 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-26 17:44 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-06-26 17:53 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2025-06-26 18:07 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-06-26 18:20 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-26 18:48 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-06-26 18:55 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-26 19:06 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-06-26 19:37 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-26 18:57 ` Hans de Goede
2025-06-26 19:14 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-06-26 19:16 ` Hans de Goede
2025-06-26 19:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-06-26 19:28 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-06-26 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-06-26 19:40 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-06-26 22:21 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-27 4:56 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-06-27 14:06 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-27 14:14 ` Hans de Goede
2025-06-27 14:44 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-06-27 15:56 ` Hans de Goede
2025-06-27 16:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-27 17:59 ` Hans de Goede
2025-06-27 18:47 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-06-27 18:36 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-06-27 18:56 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-27 19:18 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2025-06-27 19:38 ` Hans de Goede
2025-06-27 19:44 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-27 20:25 ` Hans de Goede
2025-06-27 20:29 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-27 19:45 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-27 10:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-06-26 19:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-06-26 18:37 ` Hans de Goede
2025-06-26 18:42 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-26 18:45 ` Hans de Goede
2025-06-26 18:47 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-26 14:37 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-26 14:35 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Fix soc-button-array debounce Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-26 15:59 ` Mario Limonciello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=363c2b92-4bfc-4537-9fca-025eef09526f@kernel.org \
--to=superm1@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=westeri@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.