All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
	richardcochran@gmail.com, kory.maincent@bootlin.com,
	vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev, jjc@jclark.com,
	florian.fainelli@broadcom.com, opendmb@gmail.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: don't require the hwtstamp NDOs when a PHY provides timestamping
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 09:12:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3663f91fa60a78f8eeadb6983cf0d70f@tipi-net.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921163746.5d5d0070@kernel.org>

On 22.9.2026 01:37, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2026 12:23:37 +0200 Nicolai Buchwitz wrote:

> [...]

>> No, IMHO not here. It would change change behaviour that never worked.
>> Thus I would suggest fixing this with a follow-up to net-next.
> 
> Not sure I agree that it's separate but whatever, I don't want the 
> ioctl
> fix to miss rc5.
> 
> I'd prefer the netlink fix to also target net, tho. Netlink
> functionality should match the IOCTL, targeting -next would put user
> space in an awkward position when deciding between the two.

Ack, see 
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260922070813.1458713-1-nb@tipi-net.de/

Thanks
Nicolai

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-22  7:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-18  9:55 [PATCH net] net: don't require the hwtstamp NDOs when a PHY provides timestamping Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-18 23:25 ` Kory Maincent
2026-09-21  9:57 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-21 10:23   ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-21 23:37     ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-22  7:12       ` Nicolai Buchwitz [this message]
2026-09-21 23:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3663f91fa60a78f8eeadb6983cf0d70f@tipi-net.de \
    --to=nb@tipi-net.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jjc@jclark.com \
    --cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=opendmb@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.