From: Keith Clayton <kclayton@jps.net>
To: linuxppc-user@lists.linuxppc.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: glibc 2.1?
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 15:55:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36AE55DB.96CC94ED@jps.net> (raw)
My understanding is that one of the holdups for r5 is glibc2.1 Anyone
privy to glibc2 development? I've been putting on hold any non-critical
upgrades/compilations b/c I'd like to link against glibc2 and not have
to visit the whole libc5, glibc2, fix0961212 adventure. I haven't seen
anything mentioned on the lists but I've seen a glibc2.0.1xx rpm on
ftp.linuxppc.org.
TIA,
Keith Clayton
kclayton@jps.net
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. To unsubscribe from linuxppc-dev, send ]]
[[ the message 'unsubscribe' to linuxppc-dev-request@lists.linuxppc.org ]]
reply other threads:[~1999-01-26 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=36AE55DB.96CC94ED@jps.net \
--to=kclayton@jps.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=linuxppc-user@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.