From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4217CC433E0 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 01:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CEE9206DC for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 01:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="FIP5mv0U" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727930AbgHKBZd (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 21:25:33 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:49521 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727985AbgHKBZd (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 21:25:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1597109132; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=wbtvcQspsBIoUXrnb488GjLwznDX71oWzwrHbQ5iJ50=; b=FIP5mv0UN6C1w+pFWikNux876YbFd1FDW+K0Kbc8d8+DGjqmnTLr4Xdb6YMBoQ9u0ZIF1g tvlcN9tMyCmAjCpFnz6JO5/ruMd8iWCBG6j8CmUIgvxgELOmJVtuS95WyMO2wcBFjA18yJ CZ8kD0cGpsRG321hJYiBuj6nuZqnlhI= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-148-pNf-ZVevMQSOf93q1N0dzg-1; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 21:25:30 -0400 X-MC-Unique: pNf-ZVevMQSOf93q1N0dzg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DE2559 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 01:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8751761982 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 01:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmail23.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (zmail23.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.83.28]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8176D4EDB7 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 01:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 21:25:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Xiaoli Feng To: CIFS Message-ID: <3704067.45751512.1597109127904.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1097808468.45751159.1597108422888.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Subject: FS-Cache for cifs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [10.68.5.20, 10.4.195.16] Thread-Topic: FS-Cache for cifs Thread-Index: KXhuMfHTM790eCXfua/oIh10OZKIXQ== X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Sender: linux-cifs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Hello everyone, Recently I'd like to test fs-cache for cifs. But CONFIG_CIFS_FSCACHE is not= set defaultly. Are there any concern to enable it? Test it to enbale fs-cache. It seems wo= rk. The file=20 /proc/fs/fscache/stats is update when do some cp operations. Thanks. --=20 Best regards! XiaoLi Feng =E5=86=AF=E5=B0=8F=E4=B8=BD