From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TJOBs-0008H1-Hn for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2012 14:36:40 +0200 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Oct 2012 05:23:39 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,527,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="229982525" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.122.52]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Oct 2012 05:23:38 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Koen Kooi Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 13:23:37 +0100 Message-ID: <3740169.CM3Q3p8ay5@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.9.1 (Linux/3.2.0-31-generic-pae; KDE/4.9.1; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <8836BA14-373E-4530-8F81-9EE8DA000926@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <4258940.BqvSfKhsZ3@helios> <8836BA14-373E-4530-8F81-9EE8DA000926@dominion.thruhere.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [meta-webserver][PATCH 2/6] apache2: add from OE-Classic X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 12:36:40 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Wednesday 03 October 2012 13:41:38 Koen Kooi wrote: > Op 3 okt. 2012, om 13:28 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven: > >>> + +PR = "r0" > >> > >> that's the default, drop that > > > > I'm sorry, but for reasons I've already stated on several occasions, I > > won't leave this out in any recipe in meta-webserver, nor anywhere else > > where I'm the maintainer. > > > > Given that you often complain about people forgetting to bump PR, why do > > you insist that people should remove PR = "r0" when having it there would > > be at least slightly helpful in that regard? > > I haven't seen any evidence that having PR = r0 helps people with that. Have > a look at all the patches that were posted with missing PR bumps, they > almost all have PR present. It can't hurt, though. It certainly helps me to remember. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre