From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [64.233.166.178] (helo=py-out-1112.google.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HO9ZB-0005i4-9e for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 10:33:13 +0100 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id n39so781997pyh for ; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 01:33:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.17.12 with SMTP id u12mr13913757pyi.1173087190432; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 01:33:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from cube ( [82.193.98.6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 36sm8528779nza.2007.03.05.01.33.08; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 01:33:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 11:33:08 +0200 From: Paul Sokolovsky X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <374228801.20070305113308@gmail.com> To: Koen Kooi In-Reply-To: <45EBBF38.4020704@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> References: <407130732.20070227223500@gmail.com> <1172609341.28406.169.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1828813817.20070227233137@gmail.com> <1172613830.28406.192.camel@localhost.localdomain> <794972911.20070305013040@gmail.com> <1173051658.5832.26.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45EBBF38.4020704@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC] base_less_or_equal() for numerical value testing in OE X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:33:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Koen, Monday, March 5, 2007, 8:56:56 AM, you wrote: [] >> You only ask for screen size but I can guarantee that wouldn't be the >> last request. I'm dead set against this. > Me too, since you will get something like this: > application_1.4.5-r5_bigscreen.ipk > application_1.4.5-r5_ppc603e.ipk > application_1.4.5-r5_armv5te.ipk > application_1.4.5-r5_smallscreen.ipk > Now Marcin wants to install 'application' on his webpad and it doesn't run. Why? Because > 'application_1.4.5-r5_bigscreen.ipk' secretly is ARM instead of x86. This was covered in my original rundown of how that could be implemented. I proposed to have convention that smallscreen/datascreen virtual archs may be applied only to data packages (whose arch would be 'all' otherwise). Obviously, this can be enforced by insane.class. So, it would be: application_1.4.5-r5_ppc603e.ipk application_1.4.5-r5_armv5te.ipk + application-data_1.4.5-r5_bigscreen.ipk application-data_1.4.5-r5_smallscreen.ipk > regards, > Koen [] -- Best regards, Paul mailto:pmiscml@gmail.com