From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [143.182.124.37]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46980E01304 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:22:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from azsmga002.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.35]) by azsmga102.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Jun 2012 06:22:34 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,315,1320652800"; d="scan'208";a="111653363" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.120.116]) by AZSMGA002.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Jun 2012 06:22:34 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: yocto@yoctoproject.org Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:22:33 +0100 Message-ID: <3775842.SmlgDLmoTM@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.8.3 (Linux/3.2.0-24-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.3; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <4FCF72EA.3030200@mlbassoc.com> References: <4FCF72EA.3030200@mlbassoc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: something about gtk+-2.24.8.tar.bz2 that requires constant downloading? X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:22:35 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Wednesday 06 June 2012 09:10:34 Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2012-06-05 09:01, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Wang, Shane wrote: > >> Robert P. J. Day wrote on 2012-06-05: > >>> at this point, has the problem been identified? or does this still > >>> > >>> require a bugzilla submission? it would appear that the issue > >>> involves any package with a "+" in the package name which, for now, > >>> appears to be just that gtk+ package. would any other special > >>> characters trigger this? that's the only package i've tripped over > >>> that caused this behaviour. > >>> > >>> rday > >> > >> Yes, it has been identified. If you can't submit a bug, I can do. > >> Yes, I believe other special characters will trigger that. > >> > >> Just because I am not familiar with all fetch code, I can fix it for > >> gtk+ now but I am not sure whether that fix will bring any > >> regression bugs. Give me more time. > >> > > ok, i'll leave it in your capable hands and go find something else > > > > to nitpick. > > Has someone filed a bug on this yet? It breaks all my builds now since > I always use BB_NO_NETWORK="1" :-( For reference, Gary has filed bug 2558 to track this. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre