From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
To: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>,
sumit.semwal@linaro.org, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] dma-buf: add dma_fence_chain_contained helper
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 11:38:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <37889ae1c34026bba2cbddd4434cec11f9b1d4d3.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220204100429.2049-6-christian.koenig@amd.com>
On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 11:04 +0100, Christian König wrote:
> It's a reoccurring pattern that we need to extract the fence
> from a dma_fence_chain object. Add a helper for this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
I thought I'd reviewed this one already, but in case I didn't
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-chain.c | 6 ++----
> include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-chain.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-
> fence-chain.c
> index 084c6927b735..06f8ef97c6e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-chain.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-chain.c
> @@ -148,8 +148,7 @@ static bool
> dma_fence_chain_enable_signaling(struct dma_fence *fence)
>
> dma_fence_get(&head->base);
> dma_fence_chain_for_each(fence, &head->base) {
> - struct dma_fence_chain *chain =
> to_dma_fence_chain(fence);
> - struct dma_fence *f = chain ? chain->fence : fence;
> + struct dma_fence *f =
> dma_fence_chain_contained(fence);
>
> dma_fence_get(f);
> if (!dma_fence_add_callback(f, &head->cb,
> dma_fence_chain_cb)) {
> @@ -165,8 +164,7 @@ static bool
> dma_fence_chain_enable_signaling(struct dma_fence *fence)
> static bool dma_fence_chain_signaled(struct dma_fence *fence)
> {
> dma_fence_chain_for_each(fence, fence) {
> - struct dma_fence_chain *chain =
> to_dma_fence_chain(fence);
> - struct dma_fence *f = chain ? chain->fence : fence;
> + struct dma_fence *f =
> dma_fence_chain_contained(fence);
>
> if (!dma_fence_is_signaled(f)) {
> dma_fence_put(fence);
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h b/include/linux/dma-
> fence-chain.h
> index ee906b659694..10d51bcdf7b7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h
> @@ -66,6 +66,21 @@ to_dma_fence_chain(struct dma_fence *fence)
> return container_of(fence, struct dma_fence_chain, base);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * dma_fence_chain_contained - return the contained fence
> + * @fence: the fence to test
> + *
> + * If the fence is a dma_fence_chain the function returns the fence
> contained
> + * inside the chain object, otherwise it returns the fence itself.
> + */
> +static inline struct dma_fence *
> +dma_fence_chain_contained(struct dma_fence *fence)
> +{
> + struct dma_fence_chain *chain = to_dma_fence_chain(fence);
> +
> + return chain ? chain->fence : fence;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * dma_fence_chain_alloc
> *
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
To: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>,
sumit.semwal@linaro.org, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] dma-buf: add dma_fence_chain_contained helper
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 11:38:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <37889ae1c34026bba2cbddd4434cec11f9b1d4d3.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220204100429.2049-6-christian.koenig@amd.com>
On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 11:04 +0100, Christian König wrote:
> It's a reoccurring pattern that we need to extract the fence
> from a dma_fence_chain object. Add a helper for this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
I thought I'd reviewed this one already, but in case I didn't
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-chain.c | 6 ++----
> include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-chain.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-
> fence-chain.c
> index 084c6927b735..06f8ef97c6e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-chain.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-chain.c
> @@ -148,8 +148,7 @@ static bool
> dma_fence_chain_enable_signaling(struct dma_fence *fence)
>
> dma_fence_get(&head->base);
> dma_fence_chain_for_each(fence, &head->base) {
> - struct dma_fence_chain *chain =
> to_dma_fence_chain(fence);
> - struct dma_fence *f = chain ? chain->fence : fence;
> + struct dma_fence *f =
> dma_fence_chain_contained(fence);
>
> dma_fence_get(f);
> if (!dma_fence_add_callback(f, &head->cb,
> dma_fence_chain_cb)) {
> @@ -165,8 +164,7 @@ static bool
> dma_fence_chain_enable_signaling(struct dma_fence *fence)
> static bool dma_fence_chain_signaled(struct dma_fence *fence)
> {
> dma_fence_chain_for_each(fence, fence) {
> - struct dma_fence_chain *chain =
> to_dma_fence_chain(fence);
> - struct dma_fence *f = chain ? chain->fence : fence;
> + struct dma_fence *f =
> dma_fence_chain_contained(fence);
>
> if (!dma_fence_is_signaled(f)) {
> dma_fence_put(fence);
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h b/include/linux/dma-
> fence-chain.h
> index ee906b659694..10d51bcdf7b7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence-chain.h
> @@ -66,6 +66,21 @@ to_dma_fence_chain(struct dma_fence *fence)
> return container_of(fence, struct dma_fence_chain, base);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * dma_fence_chain_contained - return the contained fence
> + * @fence: the fence to test
> + *
> + * If the fence is a dma_fence_chain the function returns the fence
> contained
> + * inside the chain object, otherwise it returns the fence itself.
> + */
> +static inline struct dma_fence *
> +dma_fence_chain_contained(struct dma_fence *fence)
> +{
> + struct dma_fence_chain *chain = to_dma_fence_chain(fence);
> +
> + return chain ? chain->fence : fence;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * dma_fence_chain_alloc
> *
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-04 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-04 10:04 [Intel-gfx] Add warning for nesting dma_fence containers Christian König
2022-02-04 10:04 ` Christian König
2022-02-04 10:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] dma-buf: consolidate dma_fence subclass checking Christian König
2022-02-04 10:04 ` Christian König
2022-02-04 10:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-04 10:36 ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-04 10:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] dma-buf: warn about dma_fence_array container rules v2 Christian König
2022-02-04 10:04 ` Christian König
2022-02-04 10:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] dma-buf: Warn about dma_fence_chain " Christian König
2022-02-04 10:04 ` Christian König
2022-02-09 14:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-09 14:02 ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-09 14:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2022-02-09 14:42 ` Christian König
2022-02-04 10:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] dma-buf: warn about containers in dma_resv object Christian König
2022-02-04 10:04 ` Christian König
2022-02-04 10:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] dma-buf: add dma_fence_chain_contained helper Christian König
2022-02-04 10:04 ` Christian König
2022-02-04 10:38 ` Thomas Hellström [this message]
2022-02-04 10:38 ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-04 10:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/amdgpu: use dma_fence_chain_contained Christian König
2022-02-04 10:04 ` Christian König
2022-02-04 15:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Deucher
2022-02-04 15:43 ` Alex Deucher
2022-02-04 15:43 ` Alex Deucher
2022-02-04 10:40 ` [Intel-gfx] Add warning for nesting dma_fence containers Thomas Hellström
2022-02-04 10:40 ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-04 13:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2022-02-04 13:20 ` Christian König
2022-02-04 13:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/6] dma-buf: consolidate dma_fence subclass checking Patchwork
2022-02-04 13:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2022-02-04 14:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=37889ae1c34026bba2cbddd4434cec11f9b1d4d3.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.