From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [156.67.10.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 832141AA789; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 16:12:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729613576; cv=none; b=eodIKDnXlqnrwMWrhVvsNB31vcmbJPTtX+qanIojAYB2ueMuKicCRaOtFSU67xGxWCFh7dtUrQJKnMmqmX2p0r11+McwGbaNcdS82ivqjPl4nYLYQ7DinLiyPRLcKbkSuEizNspGR3bizuvuilF0l7JppehfJ6/t+3658N3c9rg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729613576; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xSCXHGE6ZuWFJ+tdHGyQI+SGlPzEYUF4wSygdvX+78c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ZGDUel/dwej+QM51SWLWanCLoVzRjYYfEgkN6fjNW2U2bUotqt0txoLgrD1Pz+Q+rXDpaxIGfg/EM4nfi+yfPq+JNJVDRlkdKhSTNlenvKkVPyTgEH8bcVkyoTCab4QDmetVJUacPCGIl7usQrQ73FgjK34UuZkyBCRjeupgOG0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b=iO3ycnOm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="iO3ycnOm" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=moTtkXueELjbJqzfurk/0XCb2iFlwGGMFHhjR6Q6KiM=; b=iO3ycnOmNECHSU/y/LmEQL1unv frvTHCRuEVEQ61OyDkk5RRXUw0QhlFyWJhrpBaNPNwUKqI5UlnzPNovnqN9r+UJNdS7ebxzzbmFA8 Som9TWOhc714/8qbs27fJ1AK3lYu+Nprfc9pnhfSarXp29BCOVDqLRpftuXqnrFdEOdI=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1t3HUv-00ArPE-La; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 18:12:41 +0200 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 18:12:41 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Yunshui Jiang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests: hsr: Increase timeout to 10 minutes Message-ID: <37f34544-b9dc-4d32-ae2f-8228cf50ffa3@lunn.ch> References: <20241022080223.718547-1-jiangyunshui@kylinos.cn> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241022080223.718547-1-jiangyunshui@kylinos.cn> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 04:02:23PM +0800, Yunshui Jiang wrote: > The time-consuming HSR test, hsr_ping.sh, actually needs 7 min to run. > Around 375s to be exact That is quite a long time, if it is being used in a CI/CD environment. If it possible to make the test faster? What takes all the time? Andrew