From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UDgNt-0001Rl-8q for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 20:21:47 +0100 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Mar 2013 11:03:42 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,803,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="273376555" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.255.12.181]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Mar 2013 11:05:03 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:05:02 +0000 Message-ID: <3810027.HT6CULjW6h@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.10 (Linux/3.5.0-24-generic; KDE/4.10.0; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20130307160542.GR32228@jama.dyndns-home.com> References: <20130213190804.GA11672@windriver.com> <20130307160542.GR32228@jama.dyndns-home.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Martin Jansa Subject: Re: [PATCH][meta-selinux] policycoreutils dependency issues X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:21:47 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Thursday 07 March 2013 17:05:42 Martin Jansa wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 02:08:04PM -0500, Amy Fong wrote: > > policyutilutils: needs some dependencies unconditionally > > > > policycoreutils will fail to compile if selinux isn't in the > > DISTROFEATURES. We move these packages out of @target_selinux. > > > > Signed-off-by: Amy Fong > > Where is this meta-selinux layer? > > I don't see it on > http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/LayerIndex I think this was an oversight. I've just added it in any case. > Was this meant for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org? According to the MAINTAINERS file in the layer, patches should be sent to yocto@yoctoproject.org. Amy, could you please re-send your patch there? > And BTW: use better syntax for PRINC to allow multiple .bbappends.. hmm > well you're having PRINC in .inc.. interesting. Yes that's probably not best practice. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre