Re: Raid 10 Problems?

[Marc Perkel <mperkel@yahoo.com>]

--- Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> wrote:

> 
> On Mar 4 2007 19:17, Marc Perkel wrote:
> >Thanks - because of your suggestion I had found the
> >instructions. But you have some interesting options
> >set. 
> >
> >-N nicearray -b internal -e 1.0
> >
> >Are these important?
> 
>   -N? What's in a name? I suppose, it's not so
> important.
>   (Arrays are identified by their UUID anyway. But
> maybe
>   udev can do something with the name someday as it
> does
>   today with /dev/disk/*.)

Not worth starting over for.

> 
>   -b internal -- seems like a good idea to speed up
>   resynchronization.

I'm trying to figure out what the default is. 

> 
>   -e 1.0 -- I wonder why the new superblock format
> is
>   not default in mdadm (0.90 is still used).
> 

Looks interesting for big arrays but not sure it's
worth starting over for. Trying to get through a 2
hour sync using 4 500gb sata 2 drives.

> 
> >pci=nommconf iommu=soft
> 
> The nvidia chipset corruption problem?
> 

Yep - that's the one.



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
It's here! Your new message!  
Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/