From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>,
Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] cpufreq: Allow drivers to receive more information from the governor
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 21:01:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3827230.0GnL3RTcl1@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20360841.iInq7taT2Z@kreacher>
Hi,
The timing of this is not perfect (sorry about that), but here's a refresh
of this series.
The majority of the previous cover letter still applies:
On Monday, December 7, 2020 5:25:38 PM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> This is based on the RFC posted a few days ago:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/1817571.2o5Kk4Ohv2@kreacher/
>
> Using intel_pstate in the passive mode with HWP enabled, in particular under
> the schedutil governor, is still kind of problematic, because it has to assume
> that it should not allow the frequency to fall below the one requested by the
> governor. For this reason, it translates the target frequency into HWP.REQ.MIN
> which generally causes the processor to run a bit too fast.
>
> Moreover, this allows the HWP algorithm to use any frequency between the target
> one and HWP.REQ.MAX that corresponds to the policy max limit and some workloads
> cause it to go for the max turbo frequency prematurely which hurts energy-
> efficiency without improving performance, even though the schedutil governor
> itself would not allow the frequency to ramp up so fast.
>
> This patch series attempts to improve the situation by introducing a new driver
> callback allowing the driver to receive more information from the governor. In
> particular, this allows the min (required) and target (desired) performance
> levels to be passed to it and those can be used to give better hints to the
> hardware.
In this second revision there are three patches (one preparatory patch for
schedutil that hasn't changed since the v1, the introduction of the new
callback and schedutil changes in patch [2/3] and the intel_pstate changes
in patch [3/3] that are the same as before.
Please see patch changelogs for details.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-14 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-07 16:25 [PATCH v1 0/4] cpufreq: Allow drivers to receive more information from the governor Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-07 16:28 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] cpufreq: schedutil: Add util to struct sg_cpu Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-08 8:33 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-12-09 17:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-07 16:29 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] cpufreq: schedutil: Adjust utilization instead of frequency Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-08 8:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-12-08 17:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-09 5:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-12-09 15:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-14 11:07 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-12-07 16:35 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] cpufreq: Add special-purpose fast-switching callback for drivers Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-08 9:02 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-12-15 4:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-12-15 15:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-07 16:38 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement the ->adjust_perf() callback Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-08 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-08 17:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-08 16:30 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] cpufreq: Allow drivers to receive more information from the governor Giovanni Gherdovich
2020-12-08 17:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-08 19:14 ` Doug Smythies
2020-12-13 19:12 ` Doug Smythies
2020-12-18 15:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-14 20:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2020-12-14 20:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] cpufreq: schedutil: Add util to struct sg_cpu Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-14 20:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] cpufreq: Add special-purpose fast-switching callback for drivers Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-14 20:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Implement the ->adjust_perf() callback Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-15 3:29 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2020-12-15 4:16 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] cpufreq: Allow drivers to receive more information from the governor Viresh Kumar
2020-12-17 15:26 ` Doug Smythies
2020-12-21 10:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-18 16:11 ` Giovanni Gherdovich
2020-12-21 16:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-23 13:06 ` Giovanni Gherdovich
2020-12-28 19:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3827230.0GnL3RTcl1@kreacher \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
--cc=ggherdovich@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.